Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Abstracts

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published March 4, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.108.103085
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.103085
Vol. 139, No. 5, 855-860, May 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/5/855    most recent
jn.108.103085v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcellos, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Carciofi, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcellos, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Carciofi, A. C.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Protein Intake during Weight Loss Influences the Energy Required for Weight Loss and Maintenance in Cats1–3,

Ricardo S. Vasconcellos4, Naida C. Borges5, Karina N. V. Gonçalves4, Júlio C. Canola4, Francisco J. A. de Paula6, Euclides B. Malheiros4, Marcio A. Brunetto4 and Aulus C. Carciofi4,*

4 Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinária, 14884-900 Jaboticabal-São Paulo, Brazil; 5 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, 74030-970 Goiânia-Goiás, Brazil; and 6 Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, 14001-970 Ribeirão Preto-São Paulo, Brazil

The effects of 2 diets with different protein contents on weight loss and subsequent maintenance was assessed in obese cats. The control group [Co; n = 8; body condition score (BCS) = 8.6 ± 0.2] received a diet containing 21.4 g crude protein (CP)/MJ of metabolizable energy and the high-protein group (HP; n = 7; BCS = 8.6 ± 0.2) received a diet containing 28.4 g CP/MJ until the cats achieved a 20% controlled weight loss (0.92 ± 0.2%/wk). After the weight loss, the cats were all fed a diet containing 28.0 g CP/MJ at an amount sufficient to maintain a constant body weight (MAIN) for 120 d. During weight loss, there was a reduction of lean mass in Co (P < 0.01) but not in HP cats and a reduction in leptinemia in both groups (P < 0.01). Energy intake per kilogram of metabolic weight (kg–0.40) to maintain the same rate of weight loss was lower (P < 0.04) in the Co (344 ± 15.9 kJ·kg–0.40·d–1) than in the HP group (377 ± 12.4 kJ·kg–0.40·d–1). During the first 40 d of MAIN, the energy requirement for weight maintenance was 398.7 ± 9.7 kJ·kg–0.40·d–1 for both groups, corresponding to 73% of the NRC recommendation. The required energy gradually increased in both groups (P < 0.05) but at a faster rate in HP; therefore, the energy consumption during the last 40 d of the MAIN was higher (P < 0.001) for the HP cats (533.8 ± 7.4 kJ·kg–0.40·d–1) than for the control cats (462.3 ± 9.6 kJ·kg–0.40·d–1). These findings suggest that HP diets allow a higher energy intake to weight loss in cats, reducing the intensity of energy restriction. Protein intake also seemed to have long-term effects so that weight maintenance required more energy after weight loss.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aulus.carciofi{at}gmail.com.

Manuscript received 2 December 2008. Initial review completed 21 December 2008. Revision accepted 4 February 2009.

Published online 4 March 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition