Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published December 23, 2008; doi:10.3945/jn.108.096123
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.096123
Vol. 139, No. 2, 394-399, February 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/2/394    most recent
jn.108.096123v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viskaal-van Dongen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kok, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viskaal-van Dongen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kok, F. J.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Ingestive Behavior and Neurosciences

Hidden Fat Facilitates Passive Overconsumption1–3,

Mirre Viskaal-van Dongen*, Cees de Graaf, Els Siebelink and Frans J. Kok

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands

Food intake regulation may be disturbed when sensory signals from foods are disconnected from their metabolic properties. Consumption of high-fat, energy-dense foods may stimulate passive overconsumption, because these foods do not provide sensory signals in accordance with the actual nutrient content. We examined the effects of perception of fat on energy intake in adults after overfeeding (Study 1) and on energy intake during a meal (Study 2). In study 1, 57 participants consumed 6 mandatory lunches differing in energy level (100, 200, and 300% of a standard lunch intake) and fat condition (visible fat and hidden fat). Ad libitum energy intake was measured during subsequent meals. In Study 2, 51 participants consumed 2 lunches that were high in visible or hidden fats. We measured ad libitum energy intake during lunch. In Study 1, the energy intake at dinner was 8% higher in the hidden fat condition than in the visible fat condition (P = 0.0046). A main effect was also found for the energy level of the lunch (P < 0.0001), with the highest intake following the 100% energy level and the lowest intake following the 300% energy level. In Study 2, the energy intake was 9% higher in the hidden fat condition than in the visible fat condition (P = 0.013). Perception of fat influences energy intake. In the presence of visible fats, energy intake was lower than in the presence of hidden fats, suggesting that hidden fats may contribute to overconsumption. Appropriate sensory signals may be important in preventing overconsumption.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mirre.vandongen{at}wur.nl.

Manuscript received 10 July 2008. Initial review completed 18 August 2008. Revision accepted 19 November 2008.

Published online 23 December 2008.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Griffioen-Roose, M. Mars, G. Finlayson, J. E. Blundell, and C. de Graaf
Satiation Due to Equally Palatable Sweet and Savory Meals Does Not Differ in Normal Weight Young Adults
J. Nutr., November 1, 2009; 139(11): 2093 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Zijlstra, R. de Wijk, M. Mars, A. Stafleu, and C. de Graaf
Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2009; 90(2): 269 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition