QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Supplemental Material All Versions of this Article: 139/2/271    most recent jn.108.095125v1 Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Demonty, I. Articles by Trautwein, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Demonty, I. Articles by Trautwein, E. A.

---

Nutrition and Disease

Continuous Dose-Response Relationship of the LDL-Cholesterol–Lowering Effect of Phytosterol Intake^1,2

³ Unilever R&D, 3130 AC Vlaardingen, The Netherlands; and ⁴ Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands

Phytosterols (plant sterols and stanols) are well known for their LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C)–lowering effect. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults was performed to establish a continuous dose-response relationship that would allow predicting the LDL-C–lowering efficacy of different phytosterol doses. Eighty-four trials including 141 trial arms were included. A nonlinear equation comprising 2 parameters (the maximal LDL-C lowering and an incremental dose step) was used to describe the dose-response curve. The overall pooled absolute (mmol/L) and relative (%) LDL-C–lowering effects of phytosterols were also assessed with a random effects model. The pooled LDL-C reduction was 0.34 mmol/L (95% CI: –0.36, –0.31) or 8.8% (95% CI: –9.4, –8.3) for a mean daily dose of 2.15 g phytosterols. The impacts of subject baseline characteristics, food formats, type of phytosterols, and study quality on the continuous dose-response curve were determined by regression or subgroup analyses. Higher baseline LDL-C concentrations resulted in greater absolute LDL-C reductions. No significant differences were found between dose-response curves established for plant sterols vs. stanols, fat-based vs. non fat-based food formats and dairy vs. nondairy foods. A larger effect was observed with solid foods than with liquid foods only at high phytosterol doses (>2 g/d). There was a strong tendency (P = 0.054) towards a slightly lower efficacy of single vs. multiple daily intakes of phytosterols. In conclusion, the dose-dependent LDL-C–lowering efficacy of phytosterols incorporated in various food formats was confirmed and equations of the continuous relationship were established to predict the effect of a given phytosterol dose. Further investigations are warranted to investigate the impact of solid vs. liquid food formats and frequency of intake on phytosterol efficacy.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: isabelle.demonty{at}unilever.com.

Manuscript received 24 June 2008. Initial review completed 22 July 2008. Revision accepted 18 November 2008.

Published online 12 December 2008.