QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Supplemental Material Free Access Article All Versions of this Article: 139/11/2154S    most recent jn.109.105312v1 Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Savy, M. Articles by Prentice, A. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Savy, M. Articles by Prentice, A. M.

---

Supplement: Landscape Analysis of Interactions between Nutrition and Vaccine Responses in Children

Landscape Analysis of Interactions between Nutrition and Vaccine Responses in Children^1–3,

⁵ Medical Research Council (MRC) International Nutrition Group, ⁶ Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Unit, ⁷ Immunology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK, WC1E 7HT and ⁸ MRC International Nutrition Group, Keneba, The Gambia

The world's poorest children are likely to be malnourished when receiving their childhood vaccines. It is uncertain whether this affects vaccine efficacy and whether the coadministration of nutrient supplements with vaccines has beneficial or detrimental effects. More recently, a detrimental interaction between vitamin A (VA) supplementation (VAS) and the killed diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine given in early childhood has been suggested. This report provides a critical review of the published interactions between nutritional status and/or supplementation and vaccine responses in children. Due to an absence of evidence for most nutrients, this analysis focused on protein-energy, vitamins A and D, and iron and zinc. All vaccines were considered. Both observational studies and clinical trials that led to peer-reviewed publications in English or French were included. These criteria led to a pool of 58 studies for protein-energy malnutrition, 43 for VA, 4 for vitamin D, 10 for iron, and 22 for zinc. Our analysis indicates that malnutrition has surprisingly little or no effect on vaccine responses. Evidence for definitive adjunctive effects of micronutrient supplementation at the time of vaccination is also weak. Overall, the paucity, poor quality, and heterogeneity of data make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The use of simple endpoints that may not correlate strongly with disease protection adds uncertainty. A detailed examination of the immunological mechanisms involved in potential interactions, employing modern methodologies, is therefore required. This would also help us understand the proposed, but still unproven, negative interactions between VAS and vaccine safety, a resolution of which is urgently required.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Mathilde.Savy{at}lshtm.ac.uk.

Published online 30 September 2009.