Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published September 23, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.109.112508
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.109.112508
Vol. 139, No. 11, 2061-2066, November 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/11/2061    most recent
jn.109.112508v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. U.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Nutrition and Disease

Flaxseed and Pure Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside, but Not Flaxseed Hull, Reduce Human Breast Tumor Growth (MCF-7) in Athymic Mice1,2

Jianmin Chen3, Jasdeep K. Saggar3, Paul Corey4 and Lilian U. Thompson3,*

3 Department of Nutritional Sciences and 4 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E2

Previous studies have shown that dietary flaxseed (FS) can reduce the growth of established human breast tumors in athymic mice with low circulating estrogen concentrations. In this study, we determined the effect of FS compared with pure lignan at the level it is present in FS [secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG)] and to the lignan-rich fraction [FS hull (FH)] on human breast tumor growth and their potential mechanisms of action. Ovariectomized, athymic mice, each with an implanted 17 β-estradiol (E2) pellet (0.36 mg), were injected with human estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer cells (MCF-7). When tumors were established, the E2 pellet was removed. Mice were fed either the control basal diet (BD), FS (100 g/kg diet), SDG (1 g/kg diet), or FH (18 g/kg diet) for 8 wk. Compared with the BD, FS and SDG significantly decreased the palpable tumor size, but effects of FS, SDG, and FH did not differ from one another. All treatments significantly inhibited cell proliferation, but only FS and SDG induced significantly higher apoptosis. Both FS and SDG significantly decreased mRNA expressions of Bcl2, cyclin D1, pS2, ER{alpha}, and ERβ, epidermal growth factor receptor, and insulin-like growth factor receptor. FS also reduced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 mRNA and SDG decreased phospho-specific mitogen-activated protein kinase expression. FH did not significantly reduce these biomarkers. In conclusion, pure SDG has a similar effect as FS in reducing tumor growth and in mechanisms of action, including downregulating ER- and growth factor-mediated cell signaling. The lesser effects of FH indicate a need for a higher dose to be more effective.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: lilian.thompson{at}utoronto.ca.

Manuscript received 3 July 2009. Initial review completed 17 July 2009. Revision accepted 26 August 2009.

Published online 23 September 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition