Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Abstracts

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published August 19, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.109.109637
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.109.109637
Vol. 139, No. 10, 1980-1986, October 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/10/1980    most recent
jn.109.109637v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tarasuk, V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tarasuk, V.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Community and International Nutrition

Health Canada's Proposed Discretionary Fortification Policy Is Misaligned with the Nutritional Needs of Canadians1–3,

Jocelyn E. Sacco and Valerie Tarasuk*

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3E2, Canada

Health Canada has proposed new fortification policies that will allow manufacturers to add vitamins and minerals to a wide variety of foods at their discretion and increase nutrient additions to breakfast cereals. Our objective was to examine the potential impact of these policies on nutrient inadequacies and excesses in the Canadian population. Using dietary intake data from the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 2.2 (2004), usual intake distributions from food were estimated for vitamins A and C, folate, niacin, calcium, and magnesium for all age/sex groups. The prevalence of individuals with inadequate nutrient intake and the proportion of individuals with intakes above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) were assessed where possible, assuming full implementation of the proposed policies. To approximate a "mature market" scenario, consumption patterns of fortified foods in the United States were estimated and applied to Canadian intake data. Full implementation resulted in marked reductions in inadequate intakes of vitamin A, vitamin C, magnesium, and folate, and improvements in calcium intakes for some age/sex groups. However, it caused intakes of folate, niacin, vitamin A, and calcium to rise above the UL, particularly among younger age groups. Although increased food fortification may reduce the apparent prevalence of inadequate intakes for some nutrients, there is no evidence of inadequacies for niacin or several other nutrients slated for addition. Our modeling suggests that Health Canada's proposed policies are misaligned with the nutritional needs of the population, because they are not rooted in an assessment of current nutrient intake patterns.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: valerie.tarasuk{at}utoronto.ca.

Manuscript received 5 May 2009. Initial review completed 5 May 2009. Revision accepted 24 July 2009.

Published online 19 August 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition