Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedelin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiderpass, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hedelin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiderpass, E.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:938-945, May 2008


Nutritional Epidemiology

Dietary Phytoestrogens Are Not Associated with Risk of Overall Breast Cancer But Diets Rich in Coumestrol Are Inversely Associated with Risk of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Tumors in Swedish Women1,2

Maria Hedelin3,4,*, Marie Löf3, Marita Olsson3, Herman Adlercreutz5, Sven Sandin3 and Elisabete Weiderpass3,4,6

3 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; 4 Department of Genetic Epidemiology, Samfundet Folkhälsan, SE-00250 Helsinki, Finland; 5 Institute for Preventive Medicine, Nutrition and Cancer, Folkhälsan Research Center and Division of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland; and 6 Cancer Registry of Norway, NO-0310 Oslo, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: maria.hedelin{at}ki.se.

Results from epidemiological and experimental studies indicate that phytoestrogens may protect against breast cancer. Because one of the biological effects of phytoestrogens is probably estrogenic, it's possible that the preventive effect on breast cancer differs by estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumor. We evaluated the associations between dietary phytoestrogen (isoflavonoids, lignans, and coumestrol) intake and risk of breast cancer and whether the ER/PR statuses of the tumor influence this relationship. In 1991–2 a prospective population-based cohort study among Swedish pre- and postmenopausal women was performed, making questionnaire data available for 45,448 women. A total of 1014 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed until December 2004. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to estimate multivariate risk ratios, 95% CI for associations with risk of breast cancer. Intakes of lignan, isoflavonoid, or coumestrol were not associated with breast cancer risk overall or before or after 50 y of age. The effects of lignans or isoflavonoids were independent of receptor status. However, intake of coumestrol was associated with decreased risk of receptor negative tumors (ER–PR–) but not positive tumors. The risk of ER–PR– tumors was significantly lower (50%) in women with intermediate coumestrol intake compared with those who did not consume any. In conclusion, we found no association between intake of isoflavonoids or lignans and breast cancer risk. Our results of a decreased risk of ER–PR– tumors in women with intermediate intake of coumestrol could be due to chance because of the low intake. The results should be confirmed in other studies.








Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]