Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villaverde, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villaverde, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:856-860, May 2008


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Energy Restriction Results in a Mass-Adjusted Decrease in Energy Expenditure in Cats That Is Maintained after Weight Regain1,2

Cecilia Villaverde, Jon J. Ramsey, Alice S. Green, Danny K. Asami, Seung Yoo and Andrea J. Fascetti*

Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8741

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ajfascetti{at}ucdavis.edu.

Dietary energy restriction (ER) is used to treat obesity in cats but it is often unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ER results in a sustained decrease in mass-adjusted energy expenditure (EE) that may oppose weight loss and promote weight regain. EE and body composition were measured in 10 adult neutered cats at 3 time points: baseline (obese cats), during weight loss (40% ER), and following weight regain. The cats started with a body weight (BW) of 6.1 ± 0.30 kg, body condition score (BCS) of 7.6 ± 0.14 (on a 9-point scale), and fat body mass (FM) of 38 ± 1.0% of BW. After weight loss, BW was 5.0 ± 0.19 kg, BCS was 5.5 ± 0.07 kg, and FM was 31 ± 1.6% (P < 0.01). After weight regain, BW was 6.2 ± 0.30 kg, BCS was 7.7 ± 0.16, and FM was 42 ± 1.8% (P < 0.01). Total EE decreased from 1258 ± 33.7 kJ/d to 1025 ± 39.6 kJ/d during weight loss (P < 0.001). After weight regain, EE was still lower than baseline (1103 ± 41.5 kJ/d, P < 0.001). Energy intake (EI) at baseline (1337 ± 50.6 kJ/d) was higher than EI after weight loss and regain (1217 ± 61.2 kJ/d), resulting in no differences in energy balance (78 ± 30.4 and 104 ± 35.4 kJ/d, respectively, P = 0.581). These results support the hypothesis that ER results in a mass-adjusted decrease in EE in cats that is maintained after weight regain.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. S. Green, J. J. Ramsey, C. Villaverde, D. K. Asami, A. Wei, and A. J. Fascetti
Cats Are Able to Adapt Protein Oxidation to Protein Intake Provided Their Requirement for Dietary Protein Is Met
J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1053 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]