QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xue, H. Articles by Baracos, V. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xue, H. Articles by Baracos, V. E.

---

Nutrition and Disease

Bolus Oral Glutamine Protects Rats against CPT-11-Induced Diarrhea and Differentially Activates Cytoprotective Mechanisms in Host Intestine but Not Tumor^1,2

³ Department of Oncology, ⁴ Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, and ⁵ Center of Excellence for Gastrointestinal Inflammation and Immunity Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vickieb{at}cancerboard.ab.ca.

Dietary glutamine has been suggested to preserve structural and functional integrity of the gut and high dose bolus glutamine has been hypothesized to protect against potentially fatal endotoxic shock, hyperthermic stress, and side effects of chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to relate the ability of high dose oral bolus glutamine to mitigate the severe diarrhea induced by 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin (CPT-11) chemotherapy to specific cytoprotective mechanisms [heat shock response, glutathione (GSH)] in gut and tumor tissues. Female rats bearing Ward colon tumor received CPT-11 (125 mg·kg^–1·d^–1x 3 d) with or without an oral glutamine bolus (0.75 g/kg) administered 30 min prior to each CPT-11 dose. Glutamine reduced incidence and severity of late-onset diarrhea following CPT-11 treatment (P < 0.05) and was associated with potentially beneficial and protective responses in the colon: 1) a 3.1- to 7.2-fold increase of heat shock protein (Hsp)25,-70, and -90 (P < 0.05); 2) increased reduced GSH (rGSH):oxidized GSH ratio (P < 0.05); 3) prevention of upregulated activity of a key bacterial enzyme (β-glucuronidase) in the cecal content that mediates CPT-11 intestinal toxicity (P < 0.05); and 4) increased proportions of CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes and memory CD8+ subset in mesenteric lymph nodes following CPT-11 therapy. By contrast, glutamine treatment did not alter CPT-11's antitumor activity, the amino acid concentrations, Hsp expression, or the ratio of rGSH:oxidized GSH in the tumor. Our data demonstrate a striking dichotomy in the response of tumor and host to oral glutamine administration, concurring with the concept that this nutrient may favorably alter the balance between the host and tumor.