Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Waltensperger, K. Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Waltensperger, K. Z.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:630-633, March 2008


Symposium: From Efficacy Trial to Public Health Impact: Improving Delivery and Utilization of Nutrition Programs

A Results Framework Serves Both Program Design and Delivery Science1,2

David R. Marsh3,*, Juan Carlos Alegre4 and Karen Z. Waltensperger5

3 Senior Child Survival Advisor, Save the Children, Westport, CT 06880; 4 Monitoring and Evaluation, Save the Children, Washington, DC 20036; and 5 Africa Regional Health Advisor, Save the Children, Pretoria 0127, South Africa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dmarsh{at}savechildren.org.

Health programmers and researchers must collaborate despite different mandates and technical languages. A results framework is a simple model that both disciplines can use to understand complexity, clarify assumptions and hypotheses, design programs, and ask questions to inform action research. Typically, a health program's results framework has 3 tiers and 6 boxes: a base of 4 health service intermediate results (access, quality, demand, and environment), which lead to a midlevel strategic objective (use of life-saving intervention), which leads to the goal (improved health). A situation analysis directly informs intervention selection; more difficult is selecting strategies to deliver the interventions, especially in settings of health system weakness. We propose menus and submenus of strategies to achieve each intermediate result, illustrate the use of the results framework in a program design and in clarifying research questions, and begin to propose a research agenda for "delivery scientists" responsible for recommending optimal investments to maximize use of interventions by those who need them most.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. L. Leroy and P. Menon
From Efficacy to Public Health Impact: A Call for Research on Program Delivery and Utilization in Nutrition
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 628 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. L. Garrett
Improving Results for Nutrition: A Commentary on an Agenda and the Need for Implementation Research
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 646 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]