Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Abstracts

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.094367
Vol. 138, No. 12, 2348-2355, December 2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Craeyveld, V.
Right arrow Articles by Courtin, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Craeyveld, V.
Right arrow Articles by Courtin, C. M.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Structurally Different Wheat-Derived Arabinoxylooligosaccharides Have Different Prebiotic and Fermentation Properties in Rats1,2

Valerie Van Craeyveld3, Katrien Swennen3, Emmie Dornez3, Tom Van de Wiele6, Massimo Marzorati6, Willy Verstraete6, Yasmine Delaedt7, Okanlawon Onagbesan4, Eddy Decuypere4, Johan Buyse4, Bart De Ketelaere5, Willem F. Broekaert3, Jan A. Delcour3 and Christophe M. Courtin3,*

3 Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Biochemistry and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Centre, and 4 Laboratory for Livestock Physiology, Immunology and Genetics, and 5 Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium; 6 Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; and 7 Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

To evaluate the prebiotic potential and intestinal fermentation products of wheat bran-derived arabinoxylooligosaccharides (AXOS) in relation to their structure, 5 preparations with structurally different AXOS were included (~4% wt:wt) in rat diets that mimicked the average Western human diet composition. Xylooligosaccharides (XOS), fructooligosaccharides (FOS), and inulin were used as references. The observed effects mainly depended on the average degree of polymerization (avDP) of the AXOS preparations. The AXOS and XOS preparations with a low avDP (≤3) resulted in increased colonic acetate and butyrate production and boosted bifidobacteria concentrations in the cecum, but did not significantly lower the concentrations of branched SCFA, which are considered to be markers of protein fermentation by intestinal microbiota. In contrast, an AXOS preparation with a higher avDP (61) effectively suppressed branched SCFA concentrations and thus tipped the balance away from protein fermentation. However, it neither increased colonic butyrate concentrations nor stimulated cecal bifidobacteria development. Two AXOS preparations with a similar avDP (12 and 15) but different average degrees of arabinose substitution (avDAS) (0.69 and 0.27) affected the measured intestinal characteristics similarly, suggesting that the influence of the avDAS was apparently limited and possibly overshadowed by that of the avDP. Among those tested, an AXOS preparation with an avDP of 5 and an avDAS of 0.27 exhibited the best combination of desirable effects on gut health characteristics. Compared with this optimal AXOS preparation, FOS and inulin resulted in similar bifidogenic effects with increased production of colonic acetate (inulin) but not of butyrate. These new insights into the structure-activity relation of AXOS open up new perspectives for the production and application of AXOS preparations with optimized prebiotic and fermentation properties.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: christophe.courtin{at}biw.kuleuven.be.

Manuscript received 16 June 2008. Initial review completed 27 June 2008. Revision accepted 21 September 2008.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition