Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.096990
Vol. 138, No. 12, 2342-2347, December 2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacroix, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudichon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lacroix, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudichon, C.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Ultra High Temperature Treatment, but Not Pasteurization, Affects the Postprandial Kinetics of Milk Proteins in Humans1,2

Magali Lacroix3, Cyriaque Bon4, Cécile Bos3, Joëlle Léonil5, Robert Benamouzig4, Catherine Luengo3, Jacques Fauquant5, Daniel Tomé3 and Claire Gaudichon3,*

3 INRA, AgroParisTech. UMR 914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior, CRNH-IdF, F-75005 Paris, France; 4 Department of Gastroenterology, Avicenne Hospital, CRNH Ile de France, 93009 Bobigny, France; and 5 INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, UMR1253, Science and Technology of Milk and Egg, F-35000 Rennes, France

Although the chemical and physical modifications to milk proteins induced by technological treatments have been characterized extensively, their nutritional consequences have rarely been assessed in humans. We measured the effect of 2 technological treatments on the postprandial utilization of milk nitrogen (N), pasteurization (PAST) and ultra high temperature (UHT), compared with microfiltration (MF), using a sensitive method based on the use of milk proteins intrinsically labeled with 15N. Twenty-five subjects were studied after a 1-wk standardization of their diet. On the day of the investigation, they ingested a single test meal corresponding to 500 mL of either MF, PAST, or UHT defatted milk. Serum amino acid (AA) levels as well as the transfer of 15N into serum protein and AA, body urea, and urinary urea were determined throughout the 8-h postprandial period. The kinetics of dietary N transfer to serum AA, proteins, and urea did not differ between the MF and PAST groups. The transfer of dietary N to serum AA and protein and to body urea was significantly higher in UHT than in either the PAST or MF group. Postprandial deamination losses from dietary AA represented 25.9 ± 3.3% of ingested N in the UHT group, 18.5 ± 3.0% in the MF group, and 18.6 ± 3.7% in the PAST group (P < 0.0001). The higher anabolic use of dietary N in plasma proteins after UHT ingestion strongly suggests that these differences are due to modifications to digestive kinetics and the further metabolism of dietary proteins subsequent to this particular treatment of milk.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: claire.gaudichon{at}agroparistech.fr.

Manuscript received 31 July 2008. Initial review completed 18 August 2008. Revision accepted 20 September 2008.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition