Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nebeling, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nebeling, L.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:193S-199S, January 2008


Supplement: The Examination of Two Short Dietary Assessment Methods, within the Context of Multiple Behavioral Change Interventions in Adult Populations

Evaluation of a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument for Percentage Energy from Fat in an Intervention Study1,2

Frances E. Thompson3,*, Douglas Midthune4, Geoffrey C. Williams5, Amy L. Yaroch6, Thomas G. Hurley7, Ken Resnicow8, James R. Hebert7, Deborah J. Toobert9, Geoffrey W. Greene10, Karen Peterson11 and Linda Nebeling6

3 Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, and 4 Biometry Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344; 5 Departments of Medicine, Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642; 6 Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344; 7 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208; 8 Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029; 9 Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR 97403; 10 Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881; and 11 Department of Nutrition and Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA 02115

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thompsof{at}mail.nih.gov.

The need for an inexpensive measure of dietary intake in intervention studies led to evaluation of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Percentage Energy from Fat short instrument (PFat) in a subgroup of the Behavioral Change Consortium (BCC) intervention sites. The PFat's performance was evaluated using multiple nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recalls (24HR) as a reference instrument among participants at baseline in 4 demographically diverse intervention sites of the BCC. Mean estimates of percentage energy from fat for 24HR and PFat were within 2.1 percentage points of each other in all but 2 site/gender comparisons. 24HR and PFat estimates were not significantly different (P < 0.05) among men for 2 of 3 sites, and among women for 2 of 4 sites. Deattenuated Pearson correlation coefficients for the PFat and true intake (as estimated from the 24HR using a measurement error model) were significantly different from 0 (P < 0.05) for men and women in all sites, ranging from 0.52 to 0.77 among men and 0.36 to 0.59 among women. Besides gender and site, no other factors examined (age, education, smoking status, and BMI) consistently moderated validity estimates. If accurate assessment of diet at baseline (and presumably at follow-up) is essential, a more detailed instrument such as multiple 24HR may be warranted. The question of whether the PFat adequately measures change in diet is addressed in another article in this supplement.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. A. A. Beresford, L. M. Klesges, and H. R. H. Rockett
Introduction
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 183S - 184S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. L. Yaroch, L. Nebeling, F. E. Thompson, T. G. Hurley, J. R. Hebert, D. J. Toobert, K. Resnicow, G. W. Greene, G. C. Williams, D. L. Elliot, et al.
Baseline Design Elements and Sample Characteristics for Seven Sites Participating in the Nutrition Working Group of the Behavior Change Consortium
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 185S - 192S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. E. Davis, K. Resnicow, A. A. Atienza, K. E. Peterson, A. Domas, A. Hunt, T. G. Hurley, A. L. Yaroch, G. W. Greene, T. Goldman Sher, et al.
Use of Signal Detection Methodology to Identify Subgroups of Dietary Supplement Use in Diverse Populations
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 205S - 211S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. C. Williams, T. G. Hurley, F. E. Thompson, D. Midthune, A. L. Yaroch, K. Resnicow, D. J. Toobert, G. W. Greene, K. Peterson, L. Nebeling, et al.
Performance of a Short Percentage Energy from Fat Tool in Measuring Change in Dietary Intervention Studies
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 212S - 217S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Hebert, T. G. Hurley, K. E. Peterson, K. Resnicow, F. E. Thompson, A. L. Yaroch, M. Ehlers, D. Midthune, G. C. Williams, G. W. Greene, et al.
Social Desirability Trait Influences on Self-Reported Dietary Measures among Diverse Participants in a Multicenter Multiple Risk Factor Trial
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 226S - 234S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition