![]() |
|
|
3 Centre for Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands; 4 RIKILT-Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands; 5 Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands; and 6 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: ivon.milder{at}rivm.nl.
Enterolignans are phytoestrogenic compounds derived from the conversion of dietary lignans by the intestinal microflora that may be protective against cardiovascular diseases and cancer. To evaluate the use of enterolignans as biomarkers of dietary lignan intake, we studied the relation between plasma and dietary lignans. We determined the dietary intake of 4 lignans (secoisolariciresinol (SECO), matairesinol (MAT), pinoresinol, and lariciresinol) using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition FFQ, and plasma enterodiol (END) and enterolactone (ENL) concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The population consisted of 637 men and women, aged 19-75 y, participating in a case-control study on colorectal adenomas. Participants did not use antibiotics in the preceding calendar year. We found a modest association between lignan intake and plasma END (Spearman r = 0.09, P = 0.03) and ENL (Spearman r = 0.18, P <0.001). The correlation of total lignan intake with plasma enterolignans was slightly stronger than that of only SECO plus MAT. The plasma concentrations of both END and ENL were associated with intake of dietary fiber and vegetable protein but not with intake of other macronutrients. The relation between lignan intake and plasma END was modulated by age and previous use of antibiotics, whereas for ENL, it was modulated by weight, current smoking, and frequency of defecation. However, even when we included these nondietary factors in the regression models, the explained variance in plasma END and ENL remained low (2 and 13%, respectively).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Sonestedt, S. Borgquist, U. Ericson, B. Gullberg, H. Olsson, H. Adlercreutz, G. Landberg, and E. Wirfalt Enterolactone Is Differently Associated with Estrogen Receptor {beta}-Negative and -Positive Breast Cancer in a Swedish Nested Case-Control Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3241 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M van Dam and F. B Hu Are alkylresorcinols accurate biomarkers for whole grain intake? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 797 - 798. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kuijsten, P. C. H. Hollman, H. C. Boshuizen, M. N. C. P. Buijsman, P. van 't Veer, F. J. Kok, I. C. W. Arts, and H. B. Bueno-de-Mesquita Plasma Enterolignan Concentrations and Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Nested Case-Control Study Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2008; 167(6): 734 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||