Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhargava, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amialchuk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhargava, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amialchuk, A.
© 2007 The American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 137:453-460, February 2007


Community and International Nutrition

Added Sugars Displaced the Use of Vital Nutrients in the National Food Stamp Program Survey

Alok Bhargava* and Aliaksandr Amialchuk

Department of Economics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5019

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhargava{at}uh.edu.

Recent increases in consumption of added sugars in the US can reduce intake of vital nutrients and increase the overall energy intakes. A comprehensive framework is necessary for addressing the controversy surrounding the effects of added sugars on nutrient intakes while controlling for dietary knowledge, behavioral factors, and total energy intakes, especially among low-income households. This paper analyzed the proximate determinants of 1-wk availability (or use) of added sugars by 913 households participating in the National Food Stamp Program Survey conducted in 1996–97. In addition, households' use of protein; fiber; calcium; iron; ß-carotene; vitamins A, C, E, B-6, and B-12; folic acid; and potassium were explained by socioeconomic and behavioral factors and by added sugars use. Linear programming analyses were conducted for assessing the effects of food prices on added sugars use. Participation in Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children program, food stamp benefits, and consumption of low-fat diets were associated (P < 0.05) with lower added sugars use. Furthermore, greater use of added sugars significantly lowered households' uses of protein; iron; vitamins A, C, B-6, and B-12; and potassium. Behavioral and socioeconomic variables such as adopting a low-fat diet, consuming fruits and vegetables, saving money at grocery stores, frequency of shopping trips, skipping meals, and food insecurity were often important predictors of nutrient use. Overall, the results indicated that added sugars should be discouraged in dietary guidelines, because their adverse effects on diet quality were evident in this low-income population.








Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]