![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
2 Department of Nutrition, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 3 Nutrition Unit, Department of Prevention AUSL BR/1, Brindisi, Italy; 4 Pediatric Gastroentorology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; 5 Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP), Rosario, Argentina; and 6 Department of Health, Municipality of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: onyangoa{at}who.int.
In April 2006 the WHO released a set of growth standards for children from birth to the age of 5 y. Prior to their release, the standards were field-tested in 4 countries. The main objective was to compare children's length/height-for-age and weight-for-length/height based on the new standards with clinician assessments of the same children. The study sampled children <5-y–old attending well-child clinics in 2 affluent populations (Argentina and Italy) and 2 less-affluent ones (Maldives and Pakistan). Length/height and weight were measured by doctors and epidemiologists who also recorded a clinical assessment of each child's length/height in relation to age and weight relative to length/height. Anthropometric indicators of nutritional status were generated based on the WHO standards. As expected, Pakistan and the Maldives had higher rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight than Italy and Argentina, and the reverse was true for overweight and obesity. Where stunting was prevalent, the children classified as short were a mean <–2 SD for height-for-age. In all sites, the children classified as thin were indeed wasted (<–2 SD for weight-for-height) and a positive association in trend was evident between weight-for-height and the line-up of groups from thin to obese. The overall concordance between clinical assessments and the WHO standards-based indicators attested to the clinical soundness of the standards.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. M. Dale, R. F. Grais, A. Minetti, J. Miettola, and N. C. Barengo Comparison of the New World Health Organization Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics Growth Reference Regarding Mortality of Malnourished Children Treated in a 2006 Nutrition Program in Niger Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2009; 163(2): 126 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L L Hui, C M Schooling, B J Cowling, S S L Leung, T H Lam, and G M Leung Are universal standards for optimal infant growth appropriate? Evidence from a Hong Kong Chinese birth cohort Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 561 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Nash, D. Secker, M. Corey, M. Dunn, and D. L. O'Connor Field Testing of the 2006 World Health Organization Growth Charts From Birth to 2 Years: Assessment of Hospital Undernutrition and Overnutrition Rates and the Usefulness of BMI JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2008; 32(2): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. J Cole, K. M Flegal, D. Nicholls, and A. A Jackson Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey BMJ, July 28, 2007; 335(7612): 194 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Garza and M. de Onis Introduction J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 142 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
