Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Onis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Borghi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Onis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Borghi, E.
© 2007 The American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 137:144-148, January 2007


Symposium: A New 21st-Century International Growth Standard for Infants and Young Children

Comparison of the WHO Child Growth Standards and the CDC 2000 Growth Charts1

Mercedes de Onis2,*, Cutberto Garza3, Adelheid W. Onyango2 and Elaine Borghi2

2 Department of Nutrition, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland and 3 Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: deonism{at}who.int.

The evaluation of child growth trajectories and the interventions designed to improve child health are highly dependent on the growth charts used. The U.S. CDC and the WHO, in May 2000 and April 2006, respectively, released new growth charts to replace the 1977 NCHS reference. The WHO charts are based for the first time on a prescriptive, prospective, international sample of infants selected to represent optimum growth. This article compares the WHO and CDC curves and evaluates the growth performance of healthy breast-fed infants according to both. As expected, there are important differences between the WHO and CDC charts that vary by age group, growth indicator, and specific Z-score curve. Differences are particularly important during infancy, which is likely due to differences in study design and characteristics of the sample, such as type of feeding. Overall, the CDC charts reflect a heavier, and somewhat shorter, sample than the WHO sample. This results in lower rates of undernutrition (except during the first 6 mo of life) and higher rates of overweight and obesity when based on the WHO standards. Healthy breast-fed infants track along the WHO standard's weight-for-age mean Z-score while appearing to falter on the CDC chart from 2 mo onwards. Shorter measurement intervals in the WHO standards result in a better tool for monitoring the rapid and changing rate of growth in early infancy. Their adoption would have important implications for the assessment of lactation performance and the adequacy of infant feeding and would bring coherence between the tools used to assess growth and U.S. national guidelines that recommend breast-feeding as the optimal source of nutrition during infancy.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. M Flegal, R. Wei, C. L Ogden, D. S Freedman, C. L Johnson, and L. R Curtin
Characterizing extreme values of body mass index-for-age by using the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2009; 90(5): 1314 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. H. Himes
Challenges of Accurately Measuring and Using BMI and Other Indicators of Obesity in Children
Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(Supplement_1): S3 - S22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. P. T. James and T. Lobstein
BMI Screening and Surveillance: An International Perspective
Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(Supplement_1): S42 - S49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. Rzehak, S. Sausenthaler, S. Koletzko, D. Reinhardt, A. von Berg, U. Kramer, D. Berdel, C. Bollrath, A. Grubl, C. P. Bauer, et al.
Short- and long-term effects of feeding hydrolyzed protein infant formulas on growth at <=6 y of age: results from the German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 1846 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. E. vanDijk and S. M. Innis
Growth-Curve Standards and the Assessment of Early Excess Weight Gain in Infancy
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(1): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
C J Kistin and H Bauchner
A picture is worth a thousand words
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., December 1, 2008; 93(6): 177 - 189.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. A. Dijkhuizen, P. Winichagoon, F. T. Wieringa, E. Wasantwisut, B. Utomo, N. X. Ninh, A. Hidayat, and J. Berger
Zinc Supplementation Improved Length Growth Only in Anemic Infants in a Multi-Country Trial of Iron and Zinc Supplementation in South-East Asia
J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 1969 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Hoddinott, D. Tappin, and C. Wright
Breast feeding
BMJ, April 19, 2008; 336(7649): 881 - 887.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Garza and M. de Onis
Introduction
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 142 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2007 by American Society for Nutrition