QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coates, J. Articles by Houser, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coates, J. Articles by Houser, R. F.

---

Supplement: Advances in Developing Country Food Insecurity Measurement

Comparison of a Qualitative and a Quantitative Approach to Developing a Household Food Insecurity Scale for Bangladesh^1,2

Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111

³ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jennifer.coates{at}tufts.edu.

This paper compares a qualitative and a quantitative (Rasch) method of item assessment for developing the content of a food insecurity scale for Bangladesh. Data are derived from the Bangladesh Food Insecurity Measurement and Validation Study, in which researchers collected 2 rounds of ethnographic information and 3 rounds of conventional household survey data between 2001 and 2003. The qualitative method of scale development relied on content experts and respondents themselves to evaluate household food insecurity items generated through ethnographic research. The quantitative method applied the Rasch model to assess the fit of the same items using representative survey data. The Rasch model was then used to test for differential item functioning (DIF) across diverse demographic and geographic subgroups. The qualitative assessment flagged and discarded 10 items, leaving 13. The Rasch assessment of infit and outfit flagged 3 items, and the Rasch DIF test discarded another 10 items, leaving a total of 10 items in the Rasch-derived scale. The 2 scales contained 8 of the same items. The qualitatively and quantitatively derived scales were highly correlated (r = 0.96, P < 0.01), and the 2 methods located 90% of households in the same food insecurity tercile. This convergence lends added confidence to the use of either scale for identifying food-insecure households in different regions of Bangladesh. Multiple methods should continue to be applied in a systematic and transparent way to lend additional credence to the results when they converge and to pinpoint directions for further clarification where they do not.

KEY WORDS: • food insecurity • mixed-methods • Bangladesh • qualitative methods • quantitative methods

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hackett, H. Melgar-Quinonez, R. Perez-Escamilla, and A. M. Segall-Correa Gender of respondent does not affect the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Household Food Security Scale Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2008; 37(4): 766 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Saha, E. A. Frongillo, D. S. Alam, S. E. Arifeen, L. A. Persson, and K. M. Rasmussen Household Food Security Is Associated with Infant Feeding Practices in Rural Bangladesh J. Nutr., July 1, 2008; 138(7): 1383 - 1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Webb, J. Coates, E. A. Frongillo, B. L. Rogers, A. Swindale, and P. Bilinsky Measuring Household Food Insecurity: Why It's So Important and Yet So Difficult to Do J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1404S - 1408S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]