QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zakeri, I. Articles by Butte, N. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zakeri, I. Articles by Butte, N. F.

---

Methodology and Mathematical Modeling

Normalization of Energy Expenditure Data for Differences in Body Mass or Composition in Children and Adolescents^1,2

U.S. Department of Agriculture/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030

³ To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: nbutte{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

The most appropriate model for normalization of energy expenditure (EE) data for body mass or composition in growing children and adolescents has not been studied extensively. In this study, we investigated allometric modeling for the normalization of EE data for body mass or composition in a large cohort of children (n = 833), ages 5–19 y for a wide range of physical activities. Anthropometry was performed by standard techniques, and total body fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Weight status was defined as nonoverweight or overweight based on the 95th percentile for BMI. Total energy expenditure (TEE), basal energy expenditure (BEE), sleeping energy expenditure (SEE), and cycling EE were measured during 24-h room respiration calorimetry. Walking and maximal EE (MaxEE) were measured according to a treadmill protocol. Allometric or power function models were used to identify appropriate scaling parameters for EE. For BEE and lower levels of EE, weight scaled to 0.5. For cycling and treadmill walking/running, the weight exponent approached 0.7. Scaling EE for FFM resulted in exponents of 0.6 for lower rates of EE and 0.8–1.0 for higher rates of EE. Appropriate scaling of EE for body weight and composition of children and adolescents varied primarily as a function of the level of EE. In some instances, the exponents for scaling EE by body weight or composition were influenced by gender and weight status, but not by age.

KEY WORDS: • basal energy expenditure • sleeping energy expenditure • maximal energy expenditure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. F. Butte, M. R. Puyau, F. A. Vohra, A. L. Adolph, N. R. Mehta, and I. Zakeri Body Size, Body Composition, and Metabolic Profile Explain Higher Energy Expenditure in Overweight Children J. Nutr., December 1, 2007; 137(12): 2660 - 2667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. F Butte, G. Cai, S. A Cole, T. A Wilson, J. O Fisher, I. F Zakeri, K. J Ellis, and A. G Comuzzie Metabolic and behavioral predictors of weight gain in Hispanic children: the Viva la Familia Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1478 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]