Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, K. L.
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:1341-1346, May 2006


Nutritional Epidemiology

The 2005 USDA Food Guide Pyramid Is Associated with More Adequate Nutrient Intakes within Energy Constraints than the 1992 Pyramid

Xiang Gao{dagger}, Parke E. Wilde*, Alice H. Lichtenstein* and Katherine L. Tucker*,2

* The Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA and {dagger} Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: katherine.tucker{at}tufts.edu.

The USDA issued the Food Guide Pyramid (FGP) to help Americans choose healthy diets. We examined whether adherence to the 1992 and 2005 FGP was associated with moderate energy and adequate nutrient intakes. We used data for 2138 men and 2213 women > 18 y old, from the 2001–2002 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Quadratic programming was used to generate diets with minimal departure from intakes reported for the NHANES 2001–02. We examined the effect of the number of servings/d of Food Pyramid groups set at 1992 and at 2005 FGP recommendations for 1600, 2200, and 2800 kcal (1 kcal = 4.184 kJ) levels. We calculated energy and nutrients provided by different FGP dietary patterns. Within current U.S. dietary practices, following the 1992 FGP without sodium restriction may provide 200 more kcal than recommended for each energy level. Although it can meet most of old nutrient recommendations (1989), it fails to meet the latest dietary reference intakes, especially for the 1600 kcal level. The 2005 FGP appears to provide less energy and more adequate nutrient intakes, with the exception of vitamin E and potassium for some groups. However, without discretionary energy restriction, Americans are at risk of having excessive energy intake even if they follow the 2005 FGP food serving recommendations. Our analysis suggests that following the 2005 FGP may be associated with lower energy and optimal nutrient intake. Careful restriction of discretionary calories appears necessary for appropriate energy intakes to be maintained.


KEY WORDS: • USDA food guide pyramid • energy • optimization programming • dietary reference intake • dietary pattern




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
X. Gao, H. Chen, T. T Fung, G. Logroscino, M. A Schwarzschild, F. B Hu, and A. Ascherio
Prospective study of dietary pattern and risk of Parkinson disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1486 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
X. Gao, L. Qi, N. Qiao, H. K. Choi, G. Curhan, K. L. Tucker, and A. Ascherio
Intake of Added Sugar and Sugar-Sweetened Drink and Serum Uric Acid Concentration in US Men and Women
Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
X. Gao, A. Martin, H. Lin, O. I. Bermudez, and K. L. Tucker
{alpha}-Tocopherol Intake and Plasma Concentration of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Elders Is Associated with Dietary Intake Pattern
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2574 - 2579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]