|
|
|
|
a Tasevska
Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, UK
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sab{at}mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk.
Twenty-four-hour urinary nitrogen (UN) is commonly used to validate dietary assessment methods. Potassium is more widespread in food than nitrogen, but the role of 24-h urinary potassium (UK) as a biomarker has been less studied and characterized. To investigate the performance of UK as a recovery biomarker compared with UN in subjects consuming their normal diet, 7 males and 6 females consumed known amounts of food based on their habitual varying diet (assessed beforehand from 4 consecutive 7-d food diaries) for 30 d in a metabolic suite. All daily urine samples and dietary duplicates were collected, and N and K were measured. Stool K was determined in 5-d pooled samples. Thirty-day mean analyzed K intake was 121.3 ± 25.1 (mean ± SD) mmol/d. Overall, 77 ± 6.7% of K in the diet was excreted in urine and 18 ± 5% in stool. Dietary K was correlated with UK (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). UN was 77.7 ± 6.6% of N intake and was correlated with N in the diet (r = 0.87; P < 0.001). When 16 d of intake and 8 d of urine-collection measurements were randomly selected from the 30-d measurements, correlations were significant for both K (r = 0.86; P < 0.001) and N (r = 0.92; P < 0.001). The high correlations between UK and K in the diet show that UK is a reliable recovery biomarker for use in studies of dietary measurement error. Factors for use of urinary N as a recovery biomarker are also confirmed.
KEY WORDS: dietary biomarkers diet urine potassium stool potassium urine nitrogen
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mente, E. J. Irvine, R. J. DA. Honey, and A. G. Logan Urinary Potassium Is a Clinically Useful Test to Detect a Poor Quality Diet J. Nutr., April 1, 2009; 139(4): 743 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rylander, T. Remer, S. Berkemeyer, and J. Vormann Acid-Base Status Affects Renal Magnesium Losses in Healthy, Elderly Persons J. Nutr., September 1, 2006; 136(9): 2374 - 2377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||