Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tasevska, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bingham, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tasevska, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bingham, S. A.
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:1334-1340, May 2006


Nutritional Epidemiology

Urinary Potassium Is as Reliable as Urinary Nitrogen for Use as a Recovery Biomarker in Dietary Studies of Free Living Individuals1

Natasa Tasevska, Shirley A. Runswick and Sheila A. Bingham2

Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, UK

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sab{at}mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk.

Twenty-four-hour urinary nitrogen (UN) is commonly used to validate dietary assessment methods. Potassium is more widespread in food than nitrogen, but the role of 24-h urinary potassium (UK) as a biomarker has been less studied and characterized. To investigate the performance of UK as a recovery biomarker compared with UN in subjects consuming their normal diet, 7 males and 6 females consumed known amounts of food based on their habitual varying diet (assessed beforehand from 4 consecutive 7-d food diaries) for 30 d in a metabolic suite. All daily urine samples and dietary duplicates were collected, and N and K were measured. Stool K was determined in 5-d pooled samples. Thirty-day mean analyzed K intake was 121.3 ± 25.1 (mean ± SD) mmol/d. Overall, 77 ± 6.7% of K in the diet was excreted in urine and 18 ± 5% in stool. Dietary K was correlated with UK (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). UN was 77.7 ± 6.6% of N intake and was correlated with N in the diet (r = 0.87; P < 0.001). When 16 d of intake and 8 d of urine-collection measurements were randomly selected from the 30-d measurements, correlations were significant for both K (r = 0.86; P < 0.001) and N (r = 0.92; P < 0.001). The high correlations between UK and K in the diet show that UK is a reliable recovery biomarker for use in studies of dietary measurement error. Factors for use of urinary N as a recovery biomarker are also confirmed.


KEY WORDS: • dietary biomarkers • diet • urine potassium • stool potassium • urine nitrogen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Mente, E. J. Irvine, R. J. DA. Honey, and A. G. Logan
Urinary Potassium Is a Clinically Useful Test to Detect a Poor Quality Diet
J. Nutr., April 1, 2009; 139(4): 743 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Rylander, T. Remer, S. Berkemeyer, and J. Vormann
Acid-Base Status Affects Renal Magnesium Losses in Healthy, Elderly Persons
J. Nutr., September 1, 2006; 136(9): 2374 - 2377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2006 by American Society for Nutrition