QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Savaiano, D. A. Articles by McCabe, G. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Savaiano, D. A. Articles by McCabe, G. P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Lactose Intolerance

---

Symposium: Calcium-Related Chronic Diseases in Ethnic Minorities: Can Dairy Consumption Reduce Health Disparities?

Lactose Intolerance Symptoms Assessed by Meta-Analysis: A Grain of Truth That Leads to Exaggeration^1,2

Dennis A. Savaiano^*,3, Carol J. Boushey^* and George P. McCabe

^* Department of Foods and Nutrition and Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

³ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: savaiano{at}purdue.edu.

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the lactose intolerance symptoms of lactose maldigesters after consuming lactose (as milk, lactose dissolved in water, milk products, or commercial product) with responses after a placebo under masked conditions. An English language MEDLINE search was conducted using the medical subject heading of "lactose intolerance" from 1966 to January 2002. From an initial 1,553 citations, 2 independent reviewers selected 21 studies based on study design (randomized, crossover, blind) and use of an amount of lactose likely to be found in a meal (7–25 g) and a placebo among subjects free of gastrointestinal problems and >4 years old. Mean severity of symptom responses were analyzed as standardized differences, and the presence or absence of a symptom was estimated as pooled incidence differences (ID). For severity of flatulence, the standardized difference was 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] –0.16 to +0.52). The CIs for abdominal bloating and pain, degree of diarrhea, frequency of bowel movements per day, and frequency of diarrhea per day also included 0. For abdominal bloating, the ID was 5.9 more people per 100 with symptoms after lactose than placebo (CI –0.07 to +0.19). This same nonsignificant relationship was found for abdominal pain. The ID for diarrhea or loose stools was 0.15 (CI 0.03 to 0.28). Although the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher, the size of the effect was very small. The results indicate that lactose is not a major cause of symptoms for lactose maldigesters following usual intakes of dairy foods, that is, 1 cup.

KEY WORDS: • lactose intolerance • milk intolerance • meta-analysis • lactose digestion • flatulence

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P Waud, S. B Matthews, and A. K Campbell Measurement of breath hydrogen and methane, together with lactase genotype, defines the current best practice for investigation of lactose sensitivity Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 50 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hoppe, G. S. Andersen, S. Jacobsen, C. Molgaard, H. Friis, P. T. Sangild, and K. F. Michaelsen The Use of Whey or Skimmed Milk Powder in Fortified Blended Foods for Vulnerable Groups J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 145S - 161S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]