Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ten Bruggencate, S. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Meer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ten Bruggencate, S. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Meer, R.
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:70-74, January 2006


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Dietary Fructooligosaccharides Affect Intestinal Barrier Function in Healthy Men

Sandra J. M. Ten Bruggencate*, Ingeborg M. J. Bovee-Oudenhoven*,1, Mischa L. G. Lettink-Wissink*, Martijn B. Katan{dagger} and Roelof van der Meer*

* Nutrition and Health Program, Wageningen Center for Food Sciences/NIZO Food Research, 6710 BA Ede, The Netherlands and {dagger} Nutrition and Health Program, Wageningen Center for Food Sciences, Wageningen, The Netherlands

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: ingeborg.bovee{at}nizo.nl.

ABSTRACT

In contrast to most expectations, we showed previously that dietary fructooligosaccharides (FOS) stimulate intestinal colonization and translocation of invasive Salmonella enteritidis in rats. Even before infection, FOS increased the cytotoxicity of fecal water, mucin excretion, and intestinal permeability. In the present study, we tested whether FOS has these effects in humans. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 2 x 2 wk, with a washout period of 2 wk, was performed with 34 healthy men. Each day, subjects consumed lemonade containing either 20 g FOS or placebo and the intestinal permeability marker chromium EDTA (CrEDTA). On the last 2 d of each supplement period, subjects scored their gastrointestinal complaints on a visual analog scale and collected feces and urine for 24 h. Fecal lactic acid was measured using a colorimetric enzymatic kit. The cytotoxicity of fecal water was determined with an in vitro bioassay, fecal mucins were quantified fluorimetrically, and intestinal permeability was determined by measuring urinary CrEDTA excretion. In agreement with our animal studies, FOS fermentation increased fecal wet weight, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and lactic acid. Consumption of FOS increased flatulence and intestinal bloating. In addition, FOS consumption doubled fecal mucin excretion, indicating mucosal irritation. However, FOS did not affect the cytotoxicity of fecal water and intestinal permeability. The FOS-induced increase in mucin excretion in our human study suggests mucosal irritation in humans, but the overall effects are more moderate than those in rats.


KEY WORDS: • fructooligosaccharides • humans • microflora • mucin • prebiotics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. Guarner
Studies with Inulin-Type Fructans on Intestinal Infections, Permeability, and Inflammation
J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2568S - 2571S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
I. S. Middelbos, M. R. Godoy, N. D. Fastinger, and G. C. Fahey Jr.
A dose-response evaluation of spray-dried yeast cell wall supplementation of diets fed to adult dogs: Effects on nutrient digestibility, immune indices, and fecal microbial populations
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 3022 - 3032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. Guarner
Prebiotics and Mucosal Barrier Function
J. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 136(8): 2269 - 2269.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]