Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gleeson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gleeson, M.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:1591S-1595S, June 2005


4th Amino Acid Assessment Workshop

Interrelationship between Physical Activity and Branched-Chain Amino Acids1

Michael Gleeson2

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, England, UK

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.gleeson{at}lboro.ac.uk.

Some athletes can have quite high intakes of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) because of their high energy and protein intakes and also because they consume protein supplements, solutions of protein hydrolysates, and free amino acids. The requirement for protein may actually be higher in endurance athletes than in sedentary individuals because some amino acids, including the BCAAs, are oxidized in increased amounts during exercise compared with rest, and they must therefore be replenished by the diet. In the late 1970s, BCAAs were suggested to be the third fuel for skeletal muscle after carbohydrate and fat. However, the majority of later studies, using various exercise and treatment designs and several forms of administration of BCAAs (infusion, oral, and with and without carbohydrates), have failed to find a performance-enhancing effect. No valid scientific evidence supports the commercial claims that orally ingested BCAAs have an anticatabolic effect during and after exercise in humans or that BCAA supplements may accelerate the repair of muscle damage after exercise. The recommended protein intakes for athletes (1.2 to 1.8 g · kg body mass–1 · d–1) do not seem to be harmful. Acute intakes of BCAA supplements of about 10–30 g/d seem to be without ill effect. However, the suggested reasons for taking such supplements have not received much support from well-controlled scientific studies.


KEY WORDS: • exercise • branched-chain amino acids • supplements




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. B. Pencharz, R. Elango, and R. O. Ball
An Approach to Defining the Upper Safe Limits of Amino Acid Intake
J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 1996S - 2002S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2005 by American Society for Nutrition