Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalm, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Semba, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalm, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Semba, R. D.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:1347-1352, June 2005


History of Nutrition

They Starved So That Others Be Better Fed: Remembering Ancel Keys and the Minnesota Experiment

Leah M. Kalm and Richard D. Semba1

The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rdsemba{at}jhmi.edu.

During World War II, 36 conscientious objectors participated in a study of human starvation conducted by Ancel Keys and his colleagues at the University of Minnesota. The Minnesota Starvation Experiment, as it was later known, was a grueling study meant to gain insight into the physical and psychologic effects of semistarvation and the problem of refeeding civilians who had been starved during the war. During the experiment, the participants were subjected to semistarvation in which most lost >25% of their weight, and many experienced anemia, fatigue, apathy, extreme weakness, irritability, neurological deficits, and lower extremity edema. In 2003–2004, 18 of the original 36 participants were still alive and were interviewed. Many came from the Historic Peace Churches (Mennonite, Brethren, and Quaker), and all expressed strong convictions about nonviolence and wanting to make a meaningful contribution during the war. Despite ethical issues about subjecting healthy humans to starvation, the men interviewed were unanimous in saying that they would do it all over again, even after knowing the suffering that they had experienced. After the experiment ended, many of the participants went on to rebuilding war-torn Europe, working in the ministries, diplomatic careers, and other activities related to nonviolence.


KEY WORDS: • experiment • history • starvation • Keys




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. A. Ikizler, P. Stenvinkel, and B. Lindholm
Resolved: Being Fat Is Good for Dialysis Patients: The Godzilla Effect: Pro
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1059 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. A. Palesty and S. J. Dudrick
The Goldilocks Paradigm of Starvation and Refeeding
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2006; 21(2): 147 - 154.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]