QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Habicht, J.-P. Articles by Frongillo, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Habicht, J.-P. Articles by Frongillo, E. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service

---

Symposium: Challenges in Targeting Nutrition Programs

Discussion: Targeting is Making Trade-offs¹

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6301

²To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eaf1{at}cornell.edu.

The previous articles presented different aspects of targeting: the implicit political implications, the trade-offs in giving power to different stakeholders to decide and to implement targeting, perceptions of frontline workers in implementing a program, and a technical article about selecting a scale for targeting, which we review in greater detail. It is well recognized that targeting results in a trade-off between not serving those who should be served and including those who should not be served. Less well recognized are the trade-offs that are the consequences of deciding between using indicators of risk vs. using indicators that predict benefit.

KEY WORDS: • targeting • nutrition • programs • risk • benefit • trade-off

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.-M. Hamelin, C. Mercier, and A. Bedard Discrepancies in households and other stakeholders viewpoints on the food security experience: a gap to address Health Educ. Res., June 29, 2009; (2009) cyp033v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]