![]() |
|
|
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6301
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eaf1{at}cornell.edu.
The previous articles presented different aspects of targeting: the implicit political implications, the trade-offs in giving power to different stakeholders to decide and to implement targeting, perceptions of frontline workers in implementing a program, and a technical article about selecting a scale for targeting, which we review in greater detail. It is well recognized that targeting results in a trade-off between not serving those who should be served and including those who should not be served. Less well recognized are the trade-offs that are the consequences of deciding between using indicators of risk vs. using indicators that predict benefit.
KEY WORDS: targeting nutrition programs risk benefit trade-off
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.-M. Hamelin, C. Mercier, and A. Bedard Discrepancies in households and other stakeholders viewpoints on the food security experience: a gap to address Health Educ. Res., June 29, 2009; (2009) cyp033v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||