QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pelletier, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pelletier, D. L.

---

Symposium: Challenges in Targeting Nutrition Programs

The Science and Politics of Targeting: Who Gets What, When, and How¹

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14843-4401

²To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dlp5{at}cornell.edu.

Targeting has been defined as a method by which goods, services, or other programmatic actions are delivered to groups or individuals who have specific characteristics. Similarly, politics refers to the social processes that determine who gets what, when, and how. This similarity suggests there may be utility in undertaking an explicit analysis of how the science and the politics of targeting relate to one another. Accordingly, this article outlines a technical/scientific framework regarding targeting and, using one element of this framework [sensitivity and specificity analysis], demonstrates that recent shifts in politics and policy in the United States can be more clearly understood when viewed from this angle. Then, the article outlines a basic framework on politics and uses it to demonstrate that one of the most fundamental features of our training, practices, and outlook (specialization) holds obvious benefits for advancing research but has three undesirable effects in the realm of policy: 1) it directly or indirectly encourages narrow, partial solutions to complex problems, some of which may have unintended effects on health or well-being for the very people we seek to help; 2) it creates a cumulative demand for research dollars, specialized interventions, and policy attention that far exceeds available resources and capabilities; and 3) it often prevents us from developing and advancing the common agendas and mutual support required to be effective in political and policy realms. The article concludes that more explicit analysis along these lines could strengthen our effectiveness in the policy realm.

KEY WORDS: • targeting • food • nutrition • policy • trade-offs • values • rhetoric • liberals • conservatives

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-P. Habicht and E. A. Frongillo Discussion: Targeting is Making Trade-offs J. Nutr., April 1, 2005; 135(4): 894 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]