Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimmons, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimmons, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. H.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:444-451, March 2005


Community and International Nutrition

Low Nutrient Intakes among Infants in Rural Bangladesh Are Attributable to Low Intake and Micronutrient Density of Complementary Foods1

Joel E. Kimmons, Kathryn G. Dewey2, Emdadul Haque*, J. Chakraborty*, Saskia J. M. Osendarp* and Kenneth H. Brown

Program in International Nutrition, Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis and * ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kgdewey{at}ucdavis.edu.

We assessed the adequacy of nutrient intakes of 135 rural Bangladeshi breast-fed infants 6–12 mo of age and examined nutritional trade-offs due to possible displacement of breast milk by complementary foods. Observers completed 12-h daytime measurements of breast milk and complementary food intakes; data for the previous 12 h were obtained from maternal recall, yielding estimates of total 24-h intakes. On average, infants were mildly wasted (mean ± SD weight-for-length Z-score = –0.92 ± 0.88) and moderately stunted (length-for-age Z-score = –1.49 ± 0.96). Total energy intakes at 6–8 and 9–12 mo were 88 and 86% of absolute energy requirements (kJ/d), 106 and 105% of requirements per kg body weight, and 97 and 94% of requirements per kg median weight-for-length, respectively. Breast milk contributed 78% of energy intake at 6–8 mo and 75% at 9–12 mo. Mean meal frequency and energy density of complementary foods were generally consistent with recommendations, but only small amounts of food were offered. Nevertheless, only 72% of the food energy offered was consumed. Total energy intake was positively correlated with meal frequency, quantity consumed per meal, and energy intake from breast milk, but not with energy density of complementary foods. Energy intake from complementary foods was inversely related to energy intake from breast milk. The diets fell short of recommended intakes for numerous vitamins and minerals. We conclude that although greater intakes of complementary foods were associated with higher total energy intake, micronutrient intake remained low due to the low micronutrient density of the complementary foods consumed and the partial displacement of breast milk.


KEY WORDS: • infant dietary intake • Bangladesh • breast-feeding • complementary food • malnutrition




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. M. Lunney, A. L. Jenkins, N. V. Tavengwa, F. Majo, D. Chidhanguro, P. Iliff, G. T. Strickland, E. Piwoz, L. Iannotti, and J. H. Humphrey
HIV-Positive Poor Women May Stop Breast-feeding Early to Protect Their Infants from HIV Infection although Available Replacement Diets Are Grossly Inadequate
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M M. Islam, J. M Peerson, T. Ahmed, K. G Dewey, and K. H Brown
Effects of varied energy density of complementary foods on breast-milk intakes and total energy consumption by healthy, breastfed Bangladeshi children.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 851 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]