QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yeung, C. K. Articles by Miller, D. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yeung, C. K. Articles by Miller, D. D.

---

Nutrient Metabolism

Iron Absorption from NaFeEDTA Is Downregulated in Iron-Loaded Rats¹

Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, and ^* U.S. Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory, USDA/ARS, Ithaca, NY 14853

²To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ddm2{at}cornell.edu.

NaFeEDTA is a promising fortificant for use in plant foods, because it is less susceptible to iron absorption inhibitors and has fewer undesirable impacts on sensory quality than ferrous sulfate. However, the hypothesis that iron absorption from NaFeEDTA is effectively downregulated in iron-overload conditions has not been thoroughly tested. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare downregulation of iron absorption from ferrous sulfate and NaFeEDTA in intact iron-loaded rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed diets containing either ferrous sulfate (35 mg Fe per 1 kg diet) or elemental iron (30,000 mg Fe per 1 kg diet) for 29 d to achieve basal or iron-loaded status. While body weights and hemoglobin concentrations were the same for basal and iron-loaded rats, nonheme-iron concentrations in liver, spleen, and kidney were all significantly higher in iron-loaded rats, indicating elevated iron status. Percentage of iron absorption from ⁵⁹Fe-labeled ferrous sulfate and NaFeEDTA, determined from whole-body retention of ⁵⁹Fe activity, was 64.7 and 49.4% in basal rats but decreased to 12.8 and 10.2% in iron-loaded rats, respectively. The reductions in percentage of iron absorption from both iron sources in rats as a result of iron loading were comparable (about –80% for both iron sources). Our results suggest that iron absorption from NaFeEDTA and ferrous sulfate is downregulated to a similar extent in iron-loaded rats. Hence, NaFeEDTA is no more likely than ferrous sulfate to exacerbate iron overload in subjects with adequate body iron stores.

KEY WORDS: • iron absorption • downregulation • NaFeEDTA • ferrous sulfate • rats