Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supporting Material
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilde, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilde, P. E.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:1910-1915, August 2004


Community and International Nutrition

Differential Response Patterns Affect Food-Security Prevalence Estimates for Households with and without Children1

Parke E. Wilde2

Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: parke.wilde{at}tufts.edu.

To produce national prevalence estimates for "food insecurity" and "food insecurity with hunger," the USDA uses a battery of 18 survey items about symptoms of food-related hardship. Ten items refer to adults in the household, while 8 items refer to children in the household and hence are not asked of households without children. To equate food-security status in households with and without children, the USDA uses a statistical model from item response theory, known as the Rasch model. This model requires an assumption that adult-referenced items have the same severity calibrations for all households, including households with and without children. However, empirical estimates from the 2000 Current Population Survey showed significantly different severity calibrations for households with and without children. These differences have implications for observable response patterns. Holding constant the number of affirmative responses to adult-referenced items, households with children were more likely to respond that they "worried food would run out," and households without children were more likely to be unable to afford "balanced meals." In light of such differences, the Rasch model cannot be used to equate the food-security status of households with and without children. One potential solution would be to estimate household food security by using the same battery of adult-referenced survey items for all households.


KEY WORDS: • food insecurity • household hunger • Rasch model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. I. Kirkpatrick and V. Tarasuk
Food Insecurity Is Associated with Nutrient Inadequacies among Canadian Adults and Adolescents
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 604 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Coates, P. E. Wilde, P. Webb, B. L. Rogers, and R. F. Houser
Comparison of a Qualitative and a Quantitative Approach to Developing a Household Food Insecurity Scale for Bangladesh
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1420S - 1430S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Coates, E. A. Frongillo, B. L. Rogers, P. Webb, P. E. Wilde, and R. Houser
Commonalities in the Experience of Household Food Insecurity across Cultures: What Are Measures Missing?
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1438S - 1448S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition