Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rand, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rand, W. M.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:1610S-1616S, June 2004

Supplement: 3rd Amino Acid Workshop

Variability in Planning and Assessment: Statistical Considerations and Models1

William M. Rand2

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: william.rand{at}tufts.edu.

Nutrition researchers are called upon to inform policymakers of the consequences of consuming different amounts of various nutrients: how much is enough, how much is too much, and why. Traditionally, requirements were described by population-average levels and some measure of between-individual variation, whereas toxicities were described by single levels above which a toxic response was likely to occur. These statistics were used to estimate the prevalence of various adverse health effects in individual populations. Recently, accumulated data and improved understanding have led to more complete descriptions of the utilization of a few important nutrients and to the formulation of a model that includes both requirement and toxicity as extremes of the healthy-intake spectrum. This approach is based on estimating the full statistical distributions of individual nutritional deficits and surfeits within a population and using this to derive prevalence curves for specific adverse health effects. This information promises to provide policy planners with better tools to judge the health of populations, design feeding programs, and predict the sequelae of modifications in food supply and dietary habits.

KEY WORDS: • nutritional planning • assessment • nutrient requirement • adverse health event • prevalence • curve • deficit • protein • risk analysis






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]