QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sfeir, R. M. Articles by Tomé, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sfeir, R. M. Articles by Tomé, D.

---

Nutritional Immunology

The Mode of Oral Bovine Lactoferrin Administration Influences Mucosal and Systemic Immune Responses in Mice

Unité INRA 914 Physiologie de la Nutrition et du Comportement Alimentaire, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France and ^* Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology Vaccine Center, UAB, Birmingham, AL 35294

¹To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tome{at}inapg.fr.

Food protein intake interacts with the immune system. In earlier nutritional and immunological studies, nutrients, particularly milk whey proteins, were generally administered in soluble form and by gavage. However, orogastric intubation does not represent a natural way of ingesting nutrients such as lactoferrin (Lf). We examined how different modes of oral administration of Lf could affect the regulatory effect of this molecule on intestinal and systemic immune responses. Groups of 10 female BALB/c mice were administered Lf daily for 6 wk. To address the influence of the oral modes of administration, mice were given Lf either in solution, by gastric intubation or in the drinking water, or as a powder, by buccal deposition or in the diet. Mucosal and systemic immune responses, including specific immunoglobulin (Ig) secretion, cell proliferation, and cytokine production, were analyzed and compared with those of naïve mice given water under the same conditions or positive control mice that were administered Lf by i.m. injection. The addition of Lf to the drinking water had no visible effect on the immune status. Gastric intubation, single buccal doses, and continuous doses of Lf in the diet stimulated transient systemic and intestinal antibody responses against Lf. All of these oral modes of Lf exposure biased mucosal and systemic T-cell responses toward Thelper (Th)2-types and elevated IgA production by mucosal cells. However, the less natural gastric intubation also promoted Th1-type responses as evidenced by serum IgG_2a antibodies and the secretion of Th1 cytokine by mucosal and systemic T cells in vitro. Thus, one should carefully consider the oral mode of administration for understanding regulation of immune responses by food proteins such as Lf.

KEY WORDS: • lactoferrin • oral modes of administration • immunomodulation • mice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wakabayashi, N. Takakura, K. Yamauchi, and Y. Tamura Modulation of Immunity-Related Gene Expression in Small Intestines of Mice by Oral Administration of Lactoferrin Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 239 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schottstedt, C. Muri, C. Morel, C. Philipona, H. M. Hammon, and J. W. Blum Effects of Feeding Vitamin A and Lactoferrin on Epithelium of Lymphoid Tissues of Intestine of Neonatal Calves J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1050 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]