Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Noord, P. A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Noord, P. A. H.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:3399S-3406S, December 2004


Supplement: International Research Conference on Food, Nutrition, and Cancer

Breast Cancer and the Brain: a Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis to Explain the Opposing Effects of Caloric Deprivation during the Dutch Famine of 1944–1945 on Breast Cancer and Its Risk Factors1

Paulus A. H. van Noord2,3

Julius Center, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.a.h.vannoord{at}umcutrecht.nl.

Most studies on calorie deprivation and cancer risk in rodents show reductions in tumor occurrence. However, the few human studies on calorie restriction are conflicting. An overview is given of results in the DOM (diagnostic onderzoek mammacarcinoom) cohorts among women exposed to the Dutch Famine of 1944–1945. Opposing effects were found on risk factors (shortening of leg length, later menarche, and earlier menopause), whereas urinary estrogens and plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF binding protein-3 were increased, as was breast cancer itself. Exposure between 2 and 10 y old was an unexpected window of susceptibility to the effects of calorie deprivation. The effects of famine exposure were most clearly seen in women who never gave birth. These opposing observations can be explained by a neurodevelopmental hypothesis on set-point shifts at the level of the diencephalons/hypothalamus, either directly or from rebound effects. Such a mechanism reflects old evolutionary adaptation systems in lower and higher organisms to cope with periods of stress and famine by adjusting, for example, reproductive functions. These effects in exposed women may later also affect their unexposed offspring. This hypothesis provides several testable, hormone-mediated corollaries on the relationships between the role of calories in a Westernized lifestyle and human cancer risk. The underlying developmental perspective, as opposed to a risk factor approach, can explain why certain ages, even before breast development, are especially sensitive to effects of large fluctuations in calories. The observations presented may have implications for preventive strategies such as promoting moderation of calorie intake to curb cancer risks.


KEY WORDS: • caloric restriction • breast cancer • set point • hypothalamus • development • hypothesis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Uauy and N. Solomons
Diet, Nutrition, and the Life-Course Approach to Cancer Prevention
J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2934S - 2945S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition