Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supporting Material
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forshee, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Storey, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forshee, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Storey, M. L.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:2733-2737, October 2004


Issues and Opinions

Controversy and Statistical Issues in the Use of Nutrient Densities in Assessing Diet Quality1,2

Richard A. Forshee and Maureen L. Storey3

Center for Food and Nutrition Policy, Virginia Tech–National Capital Region, 1101 King Street, Suite 611, Alexandria, VA 22314

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mstorey{at}vt.edu.

The use of nutrient densities, such as percentage of daily energy from added sugars (%EAS), creates serious statistical analysis and interpretation problems. This article examines the statistical analyses used in the September 2002 National Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Medicine (IOM) draft report on Dietary Reference Intakes for macronutrients. The most critical issues involve the use of a ratio, %EAS, as the key analytic variable and the use of a model that does not properly control for total energy in the diet. Upon analyzing the same data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, an alternative statistical approach using multiple regression to partition total energy into "energy from added sugars" and "energy from other sources" produced very different results than the IOM analysis. Whereas the IOM reported decreasing intakes of calcium, vitamin A, iron, and zinc with increasing %EAS, we found that the association of energy from added sugars with micronutrient intake was inconsistent and small. Energy from other sources had a much stronger and consistent association with micronutrient intake. We conclude that consumption of added sugars has little or no association with diet quality.


KEY WORDS: • added sugars • dietary reference intakes • diet quality • nutrient density




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Bhargava and A. Amialchuk
Added Sugars Displaced the Use of Vital Nutrients in the National Food Stamp Program Survey
J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. I. Barr and R. K. Johnson
Effect of Added Sugars on Dietary Quality
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1336 - 1336.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. A. Forshee and M. L. Storey
Reply to Barr and Johnson
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1337 - 1337.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition