Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barua, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sidell, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barua, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sidell, N.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:286S-289S, January 2004


Supplement: Proceedings of Symposium to Honor the Memory of James Allen Olson

Retinoyl ß-Glucuronide: A Biologically Active Interesting Retinoid1,2

Arun B. Barua*,3 and Neil Sidell{dagger}

* Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA and {dagger} Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abarua{at}iastate.edu.

Numerous reports have indicated that the biological activity of all-trans retinoyl ß-glucuronide (RAG) is similar to that of all-trans-retinoic acid (RA), but without the toxic side effects of RA. In the present series of studies, we report new findings that support the contention that RAG can function as a nontoxic substitute for RA in a variety of clinic settings. One study on the effects of sc injected graded doses of RA and RAG (20–480 µmol/kg BW) into pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats showed that any differences between RAG and RA could be observed only at the highest dose levels of 360 and 420 µmol/kg BW, with RAG being much less toxic than RA. Similarly, daily topical application of RAG (0.16–1.6%) and RA (0.1–0.5%) to shaved swine dorsal skin for six mo resulted in redness and scabbing in RA-treated patches, and to a lesser extent in 1.6% RAG-treated, but not in other RAG-treated patches. Histological scores were significantly higher in the dermis and epidermis of RA-treated pigs than in RAG-treated pigs. Studies to document the pharmacokinetics of chronically administered RAG in mice indicated that, unlike RA, sustained blood levels of parent retinoid (RAG) can be achieved during at least 2 mo of daily administration. Another investigation to study the effects of RAG on the development and growth in nude mice of tumors derived from the human neuroblastoma cell line LA-N-5 showed that sc injection of RAG (30 µmol/kg BW) reduced tumor formation when the retinoid was first administered 3 d before tumor injection and continued daily for 30 d thereafter. In established tumors, RAG was shown to inhibit progressive tumor growth, the antitumor effects of RAG being comparable with RA. However, with RAG, as opposed to RA, there were no significant adverse physical side effects. Based on the results of these series of studies along with ample published reports over the last 15 y, we conclude that RAG may be a safe and effective alternative to RA and some other retinoids that are presently being utilized in the clinic.


KEY WORDS: • retinoyl glucuronide • retinoic acid • neuroblastoma • pharmacology • toxicity







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]