Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:2950S-2952S, September 2003


Supplement: Nutrient Composition for Fortified Complementary Foods

Nutrient Composition of Fortified Complementary Foods: Should Age-Specific Micronutrient Content and Ration Sizes Be Recommended?1

Kathryn G. Dewey2

Department of Nutrition and Program in International Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8669

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kgdewey{at}ucdavis.edu.

Designing a fortified complementary food that meets the nutrient needs of all breast-fed children 6–24 mo of age is a challenge because of variability in the amounts of complementary foods consumed and the very high nutrient requirements of children < 12 mo of age. A single formulation targeted for infants 6–8 mo of age will result in excessive intakes of certain nutrients (e.g., calcium, iron and zinc) if consumed by children 12–23 mo of age (up to six times the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for iron), whereas a formulation targeted for children 12–23 mo of age will provide insufficient levels of nutrients for infants 6–8 mo of age (e.g., only 4–44% of the RDA for iron). Options for resolving this dilemma include developing 1) two or more different formulations for different age groups, 2) a high nutrient-density product but specifying a maximum ration per day or 3) a lower nutrient-density product and using a combination of approaches (e.g., a separate iron supplement) to reach the higher levels needed by infants. More information is needed on efficacy, costs and feasibility of these options.


KEY WORDS: • infant nutrition • complementary foods • iron • micronutrients • fortification




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Drewnowski
Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2005; 82(4): 721 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. K. Lutter and K. G. Dewey
Proposed Nutrient Composition for Fortified Complementary Foods
J. Nutr., September 1, 2003; 133(9): 3011S - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition