Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosini, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Musk, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosini, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Musk, A. W.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:2663-2668, August 2003


Nutritional Epidemiology

The Reliability of Ten-Year Dietary Recall: Implications for Cancer Research

Gina L. Ambrosini*,2, Sofie A. H. van Roosbroeck*, Dorothy Mackerras{dagger}, Lin Fritschi*, Nicholas H. de Klerk* and A. William Musk*,**

* School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Western Australia; {dagger} Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina 0811, Northern Territory, Australia; and ** Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia.

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ginaa{at}sph.uwa.edu.au.

Remote dietary intakes may be more important than recent diet in the etiology of cancer because of the long latency in cancer development. We examined the reliability of remote dietary recall over 10 y. Subjects were 56 adults participating in a cancer prevention trial in Western Australia. All subjects completed a 28-d diet record (DR) in 1991. A food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) modified to ask respondents about their diet 10 y earlier was sent to each subject for completion in 2001. Remote intakes recalled from 10 y earlier using the FFQ were compared with the DR using the limits of agreement (LOA) method and Pearson correlation coefficients. Mean intakes of most nutrients did not differ between dietary methods. The LOA indicated that the FFQ could under- or overestimate DR estimates by >=50%. For many nutrients, agreement between methods depended on the magnitude of intake. Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranged from 0.02 for retinol to 0.66 for alcohol. These findings are similar to those of other studies that examined the reliability of recent and remote dietary intakes. They also show that using this FFQ, remote diet recalled from 10 y earlier may be as reliable as recent dietary recall.


KEY WORDS: • remote dietary recall • reliability • cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. A Thorp, P. R. Howe, T. A Mori, A. M Coates, J. D Buckley, J. Hodgson, J. Mansour, and B. J Meyer
Soy food consumption does not lower LDL cholesterol in either equol or nonequol producers
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C M. Schooling, S. Y. Ho, G. M Leung, G N. Thomas, S. M McGhee, K. H. Mak, and T. H. Lam
Diet synergies and mortality--a population-based case-control study of 32 462 Hong Kong Chinese older adults
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2006; 35(2): 418 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition