Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, R. P.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:1224-1226, April 2003


Nutritional Methodology
Research Communication

Quantifying Human Calcium Absorption Using Pharmacokinetic Methods

Robert P. Heaney2

Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University, Omaha, NE

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rheaney{at}creighton.edu.

Calcium absorption was measured simultaneously by tracer and pharmacokinetic methods in 12 men. The purpose of the study was to calibrate the area under the curve (AUC) for absorptive calcemia to permit comparison or pooling of pharmacokinetic data with tracer-derived estimates. Each subject was studied twice during intake of 500 mg calcium loads (as the carbonate salt), once without excipients, and once with a binder that impeded dissolution of the salt, reducing its absorbability and thereby providing a broad range of absorption values over which to calibrate the method. Various time periods were evaluated, with the best prediction being given by the AUC for the increment in serum calcium calculated over 9 h (AUC9). For net absorbed calcium (mmol) the relationship was given by 4.358 x AUC9 ± 0.820. The empirical regression coefficient was significant and the error of the estimate (0.820 mmol) acceptably small.


KEY WORDS: • calcium absorption • calcium absorption measurement • pharmacokinetic methods • area under the curve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. B. Drueke and J. Chanard
Oral calcium load and fractional intestinal calcium absorption
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3368 - 3369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. J. Barger-Lux, K. M. Davies, and R. P. Heaney
Calcium Supplementation Does Not Augment Bone Gain in Young Women Consuming Diets Moderately Low in Calcium
J. Nutr., October 1, 2005; 135(10): 2362 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. P. Hanzlik, S. C. Fowler, and D. H. Fisher
Relative Bioavailability of Calcium from Calcium Formate, Calcium Citrate, and Calcium Carbonate
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1217 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition