Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:1100-1104, April 2003

Hypophagic Effects of Ammonium Are Greater When Infused with Propionate Compared with Acetate in Lactating Dairy Cows

Masahito Oba and Michael S. Allen4

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

4To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: allenm{at}msu.edu.

The objective of this experiment was to determine interactions between hypophagic effects of propionate and ammonium in lactating dairy cows. Eight ruminally cannulated Holstein cows in mid-lactation were used in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design experiment with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors evaluated were type of volatile fatty acid (VFA; acetate vs. propionate) and type of salt (sodium vs. ammonium). Treatment solutions were infused continuously into the rumen at a rate of 16.7 mmol of VFA salts/min starting 2 h before feeding and ending 12 h after feeding. Hypophagic effects of ammonium were significantly greater for cows infused with propionate (4.3 vs. 12.1 kg/12 h; SEM = 1.3) compared with acetate (13.5 vs. 15.3 kg/12 h; SEM = 1.3; interaction P < 0.01). This interaction was attributed to a greater reduction in meal frequency for ammonium treatment compared with sodium treatment when infused with propionate (3.9 vs. 7.2/12 h; SEM = 0.8) compared with acetate (6.6 vs. 7.0/12 h; SEM = 0.8), indicating that infusion of ammonium propionate reduced hunger. Meal size was decreased by infusion of propionate compared with acetate, but was not affected by ammonium compared with sodium, indicating that ammonium did not affect satiety. Mechanisms to explain the interactions between ammonium and propionate on meal frequency and feed intake warrant further investigation.


KEY WORDS: • propionate infusion • ammonium • urea synthesis • feeding behavior • dairy cows




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Sairanen, H. Khalili, J. I. Nousiainen, S. Ahvenjarvi, and P. Huhtanen
The Effect of Concentrate Supplementation on Nutrient Flow to the Omasum in Dairy Cows Receiving Freshly Cut Grass
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1443 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition