QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blanck, H. M. Articles by Miller, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blanck, H. M. Articles by Miller, D. T.

---

Supplement: Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure and Nutritional Status

Laboratory Issues: Use of Nutritional Biomarkers¹

Heidi Michels Blanck^*,2, Barbara A. Bowman, Gerald R. Cooper, Gary L. Myers and Dayton T. Miller

^* Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

² To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hblanck{at}cdc.gov.

Biomarkers of nutritional status provide alternative measures of dietary intake. Like the error and variation associated with dietary intake measures, the magnitude and impact of both biological (preanalytical) and laboratory (analytical) variability need to be considered when one is using biomarkers. When choosing a biomarker, it is important to understand how it relates to nutritional intake and the specific time frame of exposure it reflects as well as how it is affected by sampling and laboratory procedures. Biological sources of variation that arise from genetic and disease states of an individual affect biomarkers, but they are also affected by nonbiological sources of variation arising from specimen collection and storage, seasonality, time of day, contamination, stability and laboratory quality assurance. When choosing a laboratory for biomarker assessment, researchers should try to make sure random and systematic error is minimized by inclusion of certain techniques such as blinding of laboratory staff to disease status and including external pooled standards to which laboratory staff are blinded. In addition analytic quality control should be ensured by use of internal standards or certified materials over the entire range of possible values to control method accuracy. One must consider the effect of random laboratory error on measurement precision and also understand the method's limit of detection and the laboratory cutpoints. Choosing appropriate cutpoints and reducing error is extremely important in nutritional epidemiology where weak associations are frequent. As part of this review, serum lipids are included as an example of a biomarker whereby collaborative efforts have been put forth to both understand biological sources of variation and standardize laboratory results.

KEY WORDS: • biomarkers • diet assessment • epidemiology • nutrition • methodology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Russell, M. Chung, E. M Balk, S. Atkinson, E. L Giovannucci, S. Ip, A. H Lichtenstein, S. T. Mayne, G. Raman, A C. Ross, et al. Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 728 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K Kant and B. I Graubard Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in variability in nutritional biomarkers Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1464 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Romieu, F. Castro-Giner, N. Kunzli, and J. Sunyer Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 179 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Kant and B. I. Graubard Ethnicity Is an Independent Correlate of Biomarkers of Micronutrient Intake and Status in American Adults J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2456 - 2463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Potischman and J. L. Freudenheim Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure and Nutritional Status: An Overview J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 873S - 874. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Marshall Methodologic and Statistical Considerations Regarding Use of Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure in Epidemiology J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 881S - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Mayne Antioxidant Nutrients and Chronic Disease: Use of Biomarkers of Exposure and Oxidative Stress Status in Epidemiologic Research J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 933S - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]