QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Noethlings, U. Articles by Boeing, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Noethlings, U. Articles by Boeing, H.

---

Nutritional Epidemiology

Portion Size Adds Limited Information on Variance in Food Intake of Participants in the EPIC-Potsdam Study¹

German Institute of Human Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, Bergholz-Rehbruecke, Germany

²To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: noethlin{at}mail.dife.de.

Food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data should reflect interindividual variation and therefore measure variance in intake among populations. We conducted this analysis to evaluate the relevance of separate portion size questions to the interindividual variation in food intake. The contribution of portion size questions to the variance in food intake was quantified and compared with the variance when group-specific portion sizes would be assigned, using 26,764 FFQ of the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Groups were defined according to gender, age (<50y, 50y) or body mass index (BMI) (<26 kg/m², 26 kg/m²). The FFQ inquired about both consumption frequency and portion size. Linear regression models for each food item were fit with intake (g/d) as dependent variables and frequency of intake as independent variables. The mean coefficient of determination (R²) for the different food items explained by frequency only was 84.0% (71.2–95.7%). The R² for gender-, age- and BMI-specific frequencies of intake did not markedly alter the overall results. We conclude that the omission of individual portion size information would probably result in a notable reduction of interindividual variance. However, to reduce the respondents’ burden and to increase data completeness in self-administration in large epidemiologic studies, the assignment of a constant portion size seems to be adequate. The variance was not increased markedly when constant gender-, age- and BMI-specific portion sizes were applied, thus supporting the assignment of an overall portion size.

KEY WORDS: • food-frequency questionnaire • portion size • EPIC-Potsdam Study

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. McNaughton, K. Ball, G. D. Mishra, and D. A. Crawford Dietary Patterns of Adolescents and Risk of Obesity and Hypertension J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Molag, J. H. M. de Vries, M. C. Ocke, P. C. Dagnelie, P. A. van den Brandt, M. C. J. F. Jansen, W. A. van Staveren, and P. van't Veer Design Characteristics of Food Frequency Questionnaires in Relation to Their Validity Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1468 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Nothlings, K. Hoffmann, M. M. Bergmann, and H. Boeing Fitting Portion Sizes in a Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire J. Nutr., December 1, 2007; 137(12): 2781 - 2786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Ganji and M. R. Kafai Population Determinants of Serum Lycopene Concentrations in the United States: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 J. Nutr., March 1, 2005; 135(3): 567 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Kant, B. I. Graubard, and A. Schatzkin Dietary Patterns Predict Mortality in a National Cohort: The National Health Interview Surveys, 1987 and 1992 J. Nutr., July 1, 2004; 134(7): 1793 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text]