Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monro, J.
© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:4256-4258, December 2003


Issues and Opinions

Redefining the Glycemic Index for Dietary Management of Postprandial Glycemia

John Monro1

New Zealand Institute for Crop and Food Research Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: monroj{at}crop.cri.nz

The glycemic index (GI) is a component-referenced index, defined as the effect on blood glucose of glycemic carbohydrate in a food as a percentage of the effect of an equal amount of glucose. GI is not suitable for dietary management of postprandial glycemia because it refers to glycemic carbohydrate, not to food, it is static, i.e., unresponsive to intake, and it is relative in that it can be used appropriately only for equicarbohydrate comparisons. Food values for dietary management, in contrast, must be food-based, intake responsive and sensitive to variations in composition typical of diets. The limitations of GI could be overcome by expanding its definition beyond glycemic carbohydrate, to foods. GI could then be used as a food-referenced index, expressed as glycemic glucose equivalents (GGE)/100 g food, and extrapolated to GGE per common standard measure (CSM) as a value for the glycemic load exerted by familiar food quantities. GIfood and GGE/CSM would then be expressed as are nutrients in food composition databases, would lie on the same quantity-dependent continuum and could be used with nutrient information to provide a more complete nutritional profile of a food than is provided by nutrients alone. GI would then be a practical adjunct to food composition data, which was its intended role.


KEY WORDS: • glycemic index • foods • glycemic glucose equivalents • virtual food components • glycemic load




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. L Mitchell
The glycemic index concept in action
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 244S - 246S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. J. Venn, A. J. Wallace, J. A. Monro, T. Perry, R. Brown, C. Frampton, and T. J. Green
The Glycemic Load Estimated from the Glycemic Index Does Not Differ Greatly from That Measured Using a Standard Curve in Healthy Volunteers
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1377 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. S. Kronfeld, K. H. Treiber, T. M. Hess, and R. C. Boston
Insulin resistance in the horse: Definition, detection, and dietetics
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E22 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition