Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swain, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swain, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J. R.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:3546-3552, November 2003


Nutrient Requirements

Bioavailability of Elemental Iron Powders to Rats Is Less than Bakery-Grade Ferrous Sulfate and Predicted by Iron Solubility and Particle Surface Area1

James H. Swain, Samuel M. Newman and Janet R. Hunt2

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jhunt{at}gfhnrc.ars.usda.gov.

Foods are fortified with elemental forms of iron to reduce iron deficiency. However, the nutritional efficacy of current, commercially produced elemental iron powders has not been verified. We determined the bioavailability of six commercial elemental iron powders and examined how physicochemistry influences bioavailability. Relative biological value (RBV) of the iron powders was determined using a hemoglobin repletion/slope ratio method, treating iron-deficient rats with repletion diets fortified with graded quantities of iron powders, bakery-grade ferrous sulfate or no added iron. Iron powders were assessed physicochemically by measuring iron solubility in hydrochloric acid at pH 1.0 and 1.7, surface area by nitrogen gas adsorption and surface microstructure by electron microscopy. Bioavailability from the iron powders, based on absolute iron intake, was significantly less than from FeSO4 (100%; P < 0.05) with the following rank order: Carbonyl (64%; Ferronyl, U.S.) > Electrolytic (54%; A-131, U.S.) > Electrolytic (46%; Electrolytic Iron, India) > H-Reduced (42%; AC-325, U.S.) > Reduced (24%; ATOMET 95SP, Canada) > CO-Reduced (21%; RSI-325, Sweden). Solubility testing of the iron powders resulted in different relative rankings and better RBV predictability with increasing time at pH 1.7 (R2 = 0.65 at 150 min). The prediction was improved with less time and lower pH (R2 = 0.82, pH 1.0 at 30 min). Surface area, ranging from 90 to 370 m2/kg, was also highly predictive of RBV (R2 = 0.80). Bioavailability of iron powders is less than bakery-grade ferrous sulfate and varies up to three times among different commercial forms. Solubility at pH 1.0 and surface area were predictive of iron bioavailability in rats.


KEY WORDS: • iron absorption • elemental iron powder • food fortification • iron bioavailability • hemoglobin repletion • rats




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. Rohner, F. O. Ernst, M. Arnold, M. Hilbe, R. Biebinger, F. Ehrensperger, S. E. Pratsinis, W. Langhans, R. F. Hurrell, and M. B. Zimmermann
Synthesis, Characterization, and Bioavailability in Rats of Ferric Phosphate Nanoparticles
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. H. Swain, L. K. Johnson, and J. R. Hunt
Electrolytic Iron or Ferrous Sulfate Increase Body Iron in Women with Moderate to Low Iron Stores
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 620 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. H. Swain, L. K. Johnson, and J. R. Hunt
An Irradiated Electrolytic Iron Fortificant Is Poorly Absorbed by Humans and Is Less Responsive than FeSO4 to the Enhancing Effect of Ascorbic Acid
J. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 136(8): 2167 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. Moretti, M. B Zimmermann, R. Wegmuller, T. Walczyk, C. Zeder, and R. F Hurrell
Iron status and food matrix strongly affect the relative bioavailability of ferric pyrophosphate in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 632 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. B Zimmermann, P. Winichagoon, S. Gowachirapant, S. Y Hess, M. Harrington, V. Chavasit, S. R Lynch, and R. F Hurrell
Comparison of the efficacy of wheat-based snacks fortified with ferrous sulfate, electrolytic iron, or hydrogen-reduced elemental iron: randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in Thai women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2005; 82(6): 1276 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Wegmuller, M. B. Zimmermann, D. Moretti, M. Arnold, W. Langhans, and R. F. Hurrell
Particle Size Reduction and Encapsulation Affect the Bioavailability of Ferric Pyrophosphate in Rats
J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3301 - 3304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition