Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Congdon, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by West, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Congdon, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by West, K. P., Jr.

© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:2889S-2894S, September 2002


Supplement: Proceedings of the XX International Vitamin A Consultative Group Meeting

Physiologic Indicators of Vitamin A Status1 ,,2

Nathan G. Congdon*3 and Keith P. West, Jr.{dagger}

* The Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland and {dagger} Program in Nutrition, Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ncongdon{at}jhmi.edu.

Physiologic indicators reflect the functional consequences of vitamin A deficiency and may be particularly useful for detecting early perturbations in vitamin A status. In conjunctival impression cytology (CIC), epithelial morphology and the presence or absence of mucin spots and goblet cells allow samples, obtained by applying filter paper to the temporal conjunctiva, to be characterized as normal or typical of vitamin A-deficient keratinizing metaplasia. The validity of CIC has been established with reference to other indicators of vitamin A status, and a prevalence of >=20% abnormal results has been suggested as indicative of a public health problem. However, interpretation of specimens requires considerable training, and nonresponsiveness to supplementation is a frequent problem, which limits the utility of CIC as a method for evaluating the impact of intervention programs. Several simplified field protocols for dark adaptation have been developed, including one in which dark adaptation is assessed by the responsiveness of the pupil to light. Night blind subjects have consistently shown abnormal results on this test, and a significant response to placebo-controlled dosing has been demonstrated for children and pregnant women. Scores have correlated significantly with serum retinol and relative dose response. Pupillary dark adaptation testing is acceptable to most children as young as 2 y old. Limitations of this technique include a time course for recovery after dosing as long as 4–6 wk, a testing time of 20 min, and the need for 1–3 d of training. Given its low cost, noninvasive nature, and lack of the need to transport samples, pupillary dark adaptation offers advantages over other techniques for assessing a population’s vitamin A status.


KEY WORDS: • physiologic indicator • conjunctival impression cytology • dark adaptation • vitamin A • pupil




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. M Graham, M. J Haskell, P. Pandey, R. K Shrestha, K. H Brown, and L. H Allen
Supplementation with iron and riboflavin enhances dark adaptation response to vitamin A-fortified rice in iron-deficient, pregnant, nightblind Nepali women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1375 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. J Haskell, P. Pandey, J. M Graham, J. M Peerson, R. K Shrestha, and K. H Brown
Recovery from impaired dark adaptation in nightblind pregnant Nepali women who receive small daily doses of vitamin A as amaranth leaves, carrots, goat liver, vitamin A-fortified rice, or retinyl palmitate
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2005; 81(2): 461 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. K. Biesalski and D. Nohr
New Aspects in Vitamin A Metabolism: the Role of Retinyl Esters as Systemic and Local Sources for Retinol in Mucous Epithelia
J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3453S - 3457S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. L. Taren, B. Duncan, K. Shrestha, N. Shrestha, D. Genaro-Wolf, R. L. Schleicher, C. M. Pfeiffer, A. L. Sowell, J. Greivenkamp, and L. Canfield
The Night Vision Threshold Test Is a Better Predictor of Low Serum Vitamin A Concentration than Self-Reported Night Blindness in Pregnant Urban Nepalese Women
J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2573 - 2578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Sommer and F. R. Davidson
Assessment and Control of Vitamin A Deficiency: The Annecy Accords
J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2845S - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
E. Wasantwisut
Recommendations for Monitoring and Evaluating Vitamin A Programs: Outcome Indicators
J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2940S - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
U. Ramakrishnan and I. Darnton-Hill
Assessment and Control of Vitamin A Deficiency Disorders
J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2947S - 2953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition