![]() |
|
|
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Shapses{at}aesop.rutgers.edu.
Weight loss is associated with bone loss and the risk may be greater in lean than heavier individuals, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. We hypothesized that energy restriction (EnR) would decrease true fractional Ca absorption (TFCA) and be mediated by Ca-regulating hormones, but differently in obese and lean rats. Rats were fed a high fat (47% energy) or low fat (16% energy) diet for 4 mo. At 6 mo of age, the resulting lean [284 ± 28g (mean ± SD, n = 18)] and obese (319 ± 34g, n = 20) groups (P < 0.005) were divided into controls (CTL, ad libitum) and energy-restricted (40% restriction) groups. At baseline, bone resorption (urinary crosslinks) was higher and bone formation (serum osteocalcin) was lower in obese than in lean rats, whereas Ca balance components and Ca-regulating hormones did not differ. EnR for 10 wk reduced body weight by 25 ± 7% compared with a 6 ± 6% gain in CTL rats (P < 0.001). For both lean and obese rats, TFCA (5-d measurement, 45Ca radioisotope) decreased from 30 ± 9% to 24 ± 9% with EnR, compared with 25 ± 10% to 29 ± 11% in controls (P < 0.05). Weight loss was directly correlated with the decrease in TFCA (r = 0.34, P < 0.05). Uterine weights indicated a reduced estrogenic activity in energy-restricted rats (P < 0.0001). In lean, but not obese rats, serum estradiol (E2) correlated with weight loss (r = 0.52, P < 0.05), and tended to correlate with the decrease in TFCA (r = 0.48, P = 0.06). At the end of the study, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D was lower and urinary Ca was higher in lean than obese energy-restricted rats. Distinct endocrine profiles during weight loss in obese and lean rats suggest that the susceptibility of bone and Ca metabolism to EnR could differ depending on initial body weight.
KEY WORDS: absorption calcium estrogen rats weight loss
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S Riedt, Y. Schlussel, N. von Thun, H. Ambia-Sobhan, T. Stahl, M P. Field, R. M Sherrell, and S. A Shapses Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 972 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Burr, C. G. Taylor, and H. A. Weiler Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Adversely Affect Bone Mass in Obese fa/fa or Lean Zucker Rats. Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2006; 231(10): 1602 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Shapses and C. S. Riedt Bone, Body Weight, and Weight Reduction: What Are the Concerns? J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1453 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cifuentes, J. P. Advis, and S. A. Shapses Estrogen Prevents the Reduction in Fractional Calcium Absorption Due to Energy Restriction in Mature Rats J. Nutr., August 1, 2004; 134(8): 1929 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cifuentes, C. S Riedt, R. E Brolin, M P. Field, R. M Sherrell, and S. A Shapses Weight loss and calcium intake influence calcium absorption in overweight postmenopausal women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||