Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollitt, E.
Right arrow Articles by Saco-Pollitt, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollitt, E.
Right arrow Articles by Saco-Pollitt, C.

© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:2617-2625, September 2002


Community and International Nutrition

Developmental Trajectories of Poorly Nourished Toddlers that Received a Micronutrient Supplement with and without Energy1

Ernesto Pollitt*2, Abas Jahari{dagger}, Mahdin Husaini{dagger}, Patricia Kariger* and Carmen Saco-Pollitt**

* Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis; {dagger} Nutrition Research and Development Center, Bogor, Indonesia; and ** Department of Education, California State University, Sacramento

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: epollitt{at}ucdavis.edu.

Experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the effects of nutritional supplements on development in young children generally include snapshots of development. Developmental outcomes are better revealed when multiple assessments are made over time. We compared the effects of a micronutrient intervention with and without supplementary energy on the mental and motor growth curves of poorly nourished toddlers in West Java. Subjects (12-mo-old cohort, n = 33; 18-mo-old cohort, n = 42) were randomly assigned to receive energy + micronutrients (E + M) or micronutrients (M) daily for 12 mo. The cohort/treatment groups were then classified as either relatively short or tall. Within the 12-mo cohort, the baseline mean length Z-scores ranged from -2.53 to -1.29 and the baseline mean weight Z-scores ranged from -3.05 to -2.18. The same pretreatment anthropometrics for the older cohort ranged from -3.22 to -1.59 and from -3.42 to -2.26. Mental and motor development scores (Bayley) were obtained at baseline and every 2 mo for 12 mo. There was a Cohort x Length Category x Supplement interaction for mental slopes (P < 0.01). Slopes for tall-E + M (b = 5.35) and tall-M children (b = 5.39) in the 18-mo cohort were equivalent, but slopes for short-E + M (b = 6.13) and short-M (b = 4.67) children differed greatly (P = 0.03). On the basis of this finding and findings previously reported from this study, we concluded that the unfavorable developmental response to the M supplement that was restricted to the shortest children within an already disadvantaged group.


KEY WORDS: • micronutrients • development • iron deficiency • supplementary feeding • energy • children







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition