![]() |
|
|
Life Sciences Research Office
Recent advances in agricultural biotechnology have highlighted the need for experimental evidence and sound scientific judgment to assess the benefits and risks to society. Nutrition scientists and other animal biologists need a balanced understanding of the issues to participate in this assessment. To date most modifications to crop plants have benefited producers. Crops have been engineered to decrease pesticide and herbicide usage, protect against stressors, enhance yields and extend shelf life. Beyond the environmental benefits of decreased pesticide and herbicide application, consumers stand to benefit by development of food crops with increased nutritional value, medicinal properties, enhanced taste and esthetic appeal. There remains concern that these benefits come with a cost to the environment or increased risk to the consumer. Most U.S. consumers are not aware of the extent that genetically modified foods have entered the marketplace. Consumer awareness of biotechnology seems to have increased over the last decade, yet most consumers remain confused over the science. Concern over the impact on the safety of the food supply remains low in the United States, but is substantially elevated in Europe. Before a genetically engineered crop is introduced into commerce it must pass regulatory scrutiny by as many as four different federal regulatory bodies to ensure a safe food supply and minimize the risk to the environment. Key areas for more research are evaluation of the nutritional benefits of new crops, further investigation of the environmental impact, and development of better techniques to identify and track genetically engineered products.
KEY WORDS: food agricultural biotechnology genetically modified
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. P. Jauhar Modern Biotechnology as an Integral Supplement to Conventional Plant Breeding: The Prospects and Challenges Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1841 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ponti Transgenic Crops and Sustainable Agriculture in the European Context Bulletin of Science Technology Society, August 1, 2005; 25(4): 289 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hashimoto, M. Ogura, K. Aritomi, H. Hoshida, Y. Nishizawa, and R. Akada Isolation of Auxotrophic Mutants of Diploid Industrial Yeast Strains after UV Mutagenesis Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2005; 71(1): 312 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Richards, C.-T. Han, R. G. Hopkins, M. L. Failla, W. W. Ward, and C. N. Stewart Jr Safety Assessment of Recombinant Green Fluorescent Protein Orally Administered to Weaned Rats J. Nutr., June 1, 2003; 133(6): 1909 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Hasler Functional Foods: Benefits, Concerns and Challenges--A Position Paper from the American Council on Science and Health J. Nutr., December 1, 2002; 132(12): 3772 - 3781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||