Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dongowski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Flamme, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dongowski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Flamme, W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dietary Fiber

© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:3704-3714, December 2002


Nutrient Metabolism

Dietary Fiber-Rich Barley Products Beneficially Affect the Intestinal Tract of Rats1

Gerhard Dongowski2, Mario Huth, Erich Gebhardt* and Wilhelm Flamme{dagger}

Department of Food Chemistry and Preventive Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Bergholz-Rehbrücke, Germany; * Institute of Nutritional and Environmental Research, Bergholz-Rehbrücke, Germany; {dagger} Institute of Stress Physiology and Quality of Raw Materials, Federal Center for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants, Groß Lüsewitz, Germany

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dongo{at}www.dife.de.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of barley-rich diets in the intestinal tract of rats. Four test groups (A–D) of 10 young male Wistar rats were fed diets containing 50 g/100 g barley extrudates (A, B and D) or mixtures (C) for 6 wk; the control diet contained no barley. The barley-containing supplements in the test diets were: A = cultivar "HiAmi"; B = "HiAmi" and "Prowashonupana" (50:50); C = "Prowashonupana" and Novelose (50:50); D = "Prowashonupana" and amylose from maize (60:40). These supplements contained 7–12 g/100 g ß-glucan and 7–24 g/100 g resistant starch. Additionally, 5 g microcrystalline cellulose/100 g was present in all diets. Carbohydrate utilization (indirect calorimetry) was lower (P < 0.05) in rats fed the barley-containing diets C or D than in the controls. In the test groups, the following differences from the controls were found: greater food intake in the last 2 wk (P < 0.05); increased weight gain in wk 6 (P < 0.05); greater mass of the ceca (groups B–D; P < 0.05) and colons (P < 0.001) as well as masses of cecal (groups C and D; P < 0.01) and colon contents (P < 0.001); greater concentrations of resistant starch in cecal and most of the colon contents (P < 0.05); and more ß-glucan in the small intestine, cecum and colon (P < 0.05). The numbers of coliforms and Bacteroides were lower than in the controls in groups B–D and those of Lactobacillus were greater in all test groups (P < 0.05). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were higher in the cecal contents of the test groups (>= 800 µmol/g DM; P < 0.001) compared with the controls (~ 200 µmol/g DM). Similarly, SCFA were higher in colon and feces of the test groups. The concentrations of excreted bile acids increased up to 30% during the feeding period. The proportions of secondary bile acids were lower and the amounts of neutral sterols (P < 0.001) were greater in feces of rats fed the barley-containing diets for 6 wk than in the controls. Diets containing more soluble macromolecular dietary fibers such as ß-glucans affected the excretion of bile acids and neutral sterols the most, whereas the fermentation of dietary fiber, including resistant starch, influenced the steroids in feces. These results suggest that dietary fiber-rich barley-containing diets have beneficial physiologic effects.


KEY WORDS: • barley • physiologic effects • rats • resistant starch • ß-glucan




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
L. Revolledo, C. S. A. Ferreira, and A. J. P. Ferreira
Prevention of Salmonella Typhimurium colonization and organ invasion by combination treatment in broiler chicks
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2009; 88(4): 734 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. R. Bird, C. Flory, D. A. Davies, S. Usher, and D. L. Topping
A Novel Barley Cultivar (Himalaya 292) with a Specific Gene Mutation in Starch Synthase IIa Raises Large Bowel Starch and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Rats
J. Nutr., April 1, 2004; 134(4): 831 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition