![]() |
|
|

*
Food Science and Nutrition Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407;
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003; and
**
ENVIRON International Corporation, Arlington, VA 22203
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lberner{at}calpoly.edu
The objective of this work was to quantify the contribution of
fortification (defined here as adding nutrients beyond traditional
enrichment standards) to dietary nutrient intakes in the United States.
A list of fortified foods was developed that was relevant at the time
of the analyses, and prefortification (naturally occurring) nutrients
in the fortified foods were determined from industry-supplied data.
Using dietary data from the 19891991 Continuing Survey of Food
Intakes by Individuals (CSFII), intakes of nine nutrients were
determined both as reported in the CSFII (i.e., postfortification) and
also by using prefortification nutrient levels for the identified
fortified foods. We report data for the total population age
1 y based on respondents (n = 11,710)
with 3 d of dietary data, as well as select age/gender subgroups.
All data were weighted. Fortification substantially increased the
intakes of all nutrients examined except calcium, in all age/gender
groups but especially in children. In numerous cases, fortification was
responsible for boosting median or 25th percentile intakes from below
to above the RDA. The breakfast cereal category was responsible for
nearly all the intake of nutrients from fortified foods, except vitamin
C for which juice-type beverages made as great or a greater
contribution. These data from 1989 to 1991 serve as a useful baseline
with which to compare contributions of fortification as the practice
expands. The large contribution of fortification even in 19891991
suggests that continued monitoring of fortification practices, using
methods such as those presented here, is important.
KEY WORDS: fortification dietary nutrient intakes CSFII 19891991
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. C. Rampersaud Benefits of Breakfast for Children and Adolescents: Update and Recommendations for Practitioners American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, March 1, 2009; 3(2): 86 - 103. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. German, M.-A. Roberts, and S. M. Watkins Personal Metabolomics as a Next Generation Nutritional Assessment J. Nutr., December 1, 2003; 133(12): 4260 - 4266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Arsenault and K. H Brown Zinc intake of US preschool children exceeds new dietary reference intakes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2003; 78(5): 1011 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Nicklas Calcium Intake Trends and Health Consequences from Childhood through Adulthood J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 22(5): 340 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Johnson-Down, M. R. L'Abbe, N. S. Lee, and K. Gray-Donald Appropriate Calcium Fortification of the Food Supply Presents a Challenge J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2232 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Alexy, W. Sichert-Hellert, and M. Kersting Fortification Masks Nutrient Dilution due to Added Sugars in the Diet of Children and Adolescents J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2785 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sommer and F. R. Davidson Assessment and Control of Vitamin A Deficiency: The Annecy Accords J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2845S - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. W Solomons and K. Schumann Collateral damage in the battle against hypovitaminosis A? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2002; 75(4): 659 - 661. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||