![]() |
|
|

2
*
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143,
Western Human Nutrition Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of California, Davis CA 95616 and
**
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jking{at}whnrc.usda.gov
The theoretical basis of the accuracy of a number of simple techniques for estimating fractional zinc absorption (FZA) in humans using stable isotopic tracers has not been evaluated. These techniques include fecal monitoring (FM), deconvolution analysis (DA), double isotopic tracer ratio (DITR) and indicator dilution methods. Using a compartmental model, we investigated the accuracy and logic of each of these techniques. Time-dependent estimates of FZA based on the simple techniques were simulated using the compartmental model and compared with the known FZA derived from the model. The analysis elucidated logical errors in some of the FM techniques, and even when these problems were corrected, the FM technique was still prone to errors due to incomplete fecal tracer recovery and variable gastrointestinal (GI) transit time. Although logically correct, the indicator dilution techniques were also highly sensitive to incomplete fecal tracer recovery and variable GI transit time. The DA and DITR techniques were the most robust in that they were logically correct and were insensitive to incomplete fecal tracer recovery and variable GI transit time. Although all of the DA and DITR methods provided similarly good estimates of FZA relative to the compartmental model, the DITR technique performed on a spot urine specimen obtained several days after tracer administration was the preferred choice because of its simplicity and minimal requirements for patient compliance.
KEY WORDS: zinc stable isotopic tracers zinc absorption compartmental modeling
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S Chung, J. Stookey, D. Dare, R. Welch, T. Q Nguyen, R. Roehl, J. M Peerson, J. C King, and K. H Brown Current dietary zinc intake has a greater effect on fractional zinc absorption than does longer term zinc consumption in healthy adult men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1224 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kim, H. Y. Paik, H. Joung, L. R. Woodhouse, S. Li, and J. C. King Effect of Dietary Phytate on Zinc Homeostasis in Young and Elderly Korean Women J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 26(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M Donangelo, C. L Vargas Zapata, L. R Woodhouse, D. M Shames, R. Mukherjea, and J. C King Zinc absorption and kinetics during pregnancy and lactation in Brazilian women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 118 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K M. Hambidge, J. W Huffer, V. Raboy, G. K Grunwald, J. L Westcott, L. Sian, L. V Miller, J. A Dorsch, and N. F Krebs Zinc absorption from low-phytate hybrids of maize and their wild-type isohybrids Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1053 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hambidge, L. Miller, N. F. Krebs, J. Westcott, and G. Grunwald Accuracy of Simple Techniques for Estimating Fractional Zinc Absorption in Humans J. Nutr., February 1, 2002; 132(2): 322 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Shames, L. R. Woodhouse, N. M. Lowe, and J. C. King Reply to Hambridge et al. J. Nutr., February 1, 2002; 132(2): 323 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sparacino, D. M. Shames, P. Vicini, J. C. King, and C. Cobelli Double isotope tracer method for measuring fractional zinc absorption: theoretical analysis Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2002; 282(3): E679 - E687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||